Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:hamcat@directvinternet.com: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RIT offset as QRM clue (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Sun Sep 1 17:47:37 2002
This has been going on for years and years, and is simply a way some use to "muscle" in on your run frequency. Moving higher will only result in the "grabber" also moving higher, and very soon, you'l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00012.html (7,726 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Re: TS-850 vs. TS-940 (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Wed Sep 4 18:10:16 2002
The solder joints around the PLL circuits are not generally to blame. It is within the little tin can which actually holds the crystal. I had 2 940s, and both developed the same problem. The solution
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00048.html (6,955 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] "please copy" (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Wed Jun 26 04:43:46 2002
With all due apologies to Jim's very insightful post, it is NOT us. That "please copy" can probably be traced to less than 50 hams in the US, operating with greatly exaggerated opinions of themselves
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00239.html (9,975 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] "Please copy..." (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Thu Jun 27 14:40:43 2002
Jim, you forgot to include "when last heard".. I am over 64, and while I am beginning to suffer some "senior moments", it does not take 1/4 second for that old brain to kick in. Call it like it is, L
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00272.html (8,502 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Club Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Wed Jul 3 17:48:58 2002
To add to the timely remarks from others, one other note is in order. IF the callsign being used is NOT a club call, the holder of that call MUST be present at all times. Field day isn't the only pla
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00033.html (6,573 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Telrex Rotator (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Mon Jul 15 21:06:37 2002
If someone is thinking of buying Bob's prop pitch, be warned there is a LOCKING NUT on the rotator housing. Remove it before applying power. Actually, in the one I had, I didn't know this. No matter,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00142.html (6,520 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Ideas for WRTC 2004 (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Thu Jul 18 17:17:27 2002
Well, perhaps one more story. In the late 80s, I and several others operated the CQWWSSB from V47. Now, to show the rediculous, we arranged for a top JA ( think his name was Yosi ) to be part of our
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00228.html (8,658 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] CW or SSB FCC says neither. (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Fri Jul 19 05:13:26 2002
"David L. Thompson" wrote: The new FCC Chairman told a group of hams that its time for amateurs to move to the new modes and leave what he considers are obsolete modes. He said (and ARRL agrees) that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00248.html (7,961 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Ideas for WRTC 2004 (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Fri Jul 19 05:18:38 2002
In my comment, I now realize that I should have changed the subject. For some of us, there are other contests besides the WRTC. 73 Ed
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00249.html (9,053 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] CW or SSB FCC says neither (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Fri Jul 19 18:51:25 2002
Well, I saw and read the entire comment also. It was a quote from Chairman Powell. It very well be it was included in the ARRL letter sent out every friday to those who subscribe. Those who have ment
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00271.html (7,498 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] ARRL report on line scores decision (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Tue Jul 23 17:40:45 2002
-- I agree whole heartily with Barry's comments above, but since "we" elected them, I belive we are entitled to a complete explanation. -- -- Again, I agree 100%. Unfortunately, I am stuck with a lif
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00336.html (9,592 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] removing FD residue (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Tue Jul 23 17:46:46 2002
snipped Don't know if this product contains it, but NBC ( I think ) ran a news item a week or so ago, and it showed the results of testing. In short, if the product doesn't contain an ingredient call
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00338.html (7,192 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] ARRL report on line scores (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Sat Jul 27 01:04:50 2002
Something funny about this message. How can W2CS write both, which are direct opposites of each other? Assumming someone quoted someone incorrectly, I don't like the use of the word "force" in regard
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00474.html (9,506 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] but are YOU really (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Mon Aug 12 19:24:10 2002
Tom is right on the ball with his answer Jim. I love cw also, but one of the most fascinating things about RTTY is you never have to hear a single sound. Just sit there with the mouse and go go go. P
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00141.html (7,621 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Need Hardline Connectors (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Thu Aug 29 18:20:19 2002
Bill K6KM Well, the cheapest and most effective method I've ever found is to make them yourself. Cut about a 6" length of the 1/2" hard line, and visit your local hardware store. Also, take along a b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00315.html (8,531 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] 160m band plan (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Tue Oct 29 22:04:07 2002
-- I think the operator will have the final say, but I firmly believe the problem is the ARRL band plan. When some ????????? puts the digital modes at 1.8 up, and SSB above 1.843, I see this as nothi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00230.html (6,956 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] CQWW and Signal Reports (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Thu Oct 31 03:17:59 2002
Without comment on the actual issue, you broke the rules, and any statement to the contrary is incorrect. Unfortunately, none of us "makes" the rules. This would result in bedlam. If you don't like
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00263.html (8,836 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Another anti-contester on QRZ.com (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Thu Oct 31 17:44:43 2002
John, NE0P makes a good point. ALL of the bitching is about SSB use. And a careful glance at the call signs of the individuals bitching should give a pretty good hint as to the license class. First t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00292.html (7,902 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] CQWW and Signal Reports (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Thu Oct 31 17:57:38 2002
I have to go along with Dallas here. I've told more than a few (mostly wrongcoasters ) that they need to check their signal, and not once have any replied with anything other than "thanks..will chec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00293.html (7,989 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] Out of Band operating (score: 1)
Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB)
Date: Thu Oct 31 18:02:40 2002
I'm surprised that no one has commented that on 21000.5 or such, you are absolutely out of the US band according to both ARRL and FCC announcements. I believe (???) they state quite emphatically that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00294.html (11,625 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu