Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:gerry@yccc.org: 285 ]

Total 285 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:13:50 -0400
GoToMyPC is great, but not required. If you use a free VPN, you get all those features, with less latency. Once you have a connection, you can use any program you want -- all the ones you've listed w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00234.html (15,066 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:30:44 -0400
IMHO, POTS costs from traditional carriers are still not that inexpensive. If you use VoIP (low cost), you might as well just use the internet. Internet remote is viable for anyone that can get broad
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00240.html (18,620 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:06:55 -0400
And, Paul, you are certainly entitled to your opinion! You have made your voice abundantly clear -- we hear ya. 59+ Glad you are paying attention to catch all those terms. Remote operation IS a part
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00244.html (11,702 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] Antw: Re: Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:27:45 -0400
Mark, What the heck does remote operation have to do with "showing putting effort in the True Game"? Ask any of the stations who have put in a REAL contest operation using a remote station, and they
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00282.html (21,070 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:16:53 -0400
Mark, Let's get to the meat of the matter: You have said you don't oppose remote operation. WHY do you oppose remote operation during a contest? What is different about it? Are you worried that the r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00305.html (21,635 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Contest Operation (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:28:02 -0400
But you do have answers, Wayne! Your answer is to put remote operation in a different category. That's no answer. Let's say you live in a beautiful house where there are antenna covenants. You have t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00307.html (12,678 bytes)

67. [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?... (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 13:19:50 -0400
There was already a discussion about the new addition to rule 4: "The use of switching systems that allow for lockouts in order to use multiple transmitters (i.e., an octopus) in an attempt to enter
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00066.html (7,320 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?... (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 09:22:25 -0400
I'm part of a 4A, I'm one band. I would not intend to EVER transmit on another band. I would not intend to transmit two signals on the same band -- in fact, with the arrangement, it's impossible. Thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00076.html (9,917 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?... (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 12:43:00 -0400
Right, Mike. My point is to demo a technique, not to try and cheat/win a category. (That would be very hard, as many of the club's folks are casual ops). Switching to 5A not possible -- club does not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00080.html (14,328 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?... (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:26:45 -0400
Agreed, Ed. In the end, It doesn't matter one hill of beans.. I'll ask the FD chairman -- but I'm simply a band captain trying to figure out what I want to do. The club has been 4A for years -- they
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00083.html (8,119 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] "Virtually there" (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:46:51 -0400
Agree 100% Felipe -- I ran N1MM in Vritualbox on my Mac Mini, with USB to my K3. I had this displayed on a 31" HD monitor in the tent.. I had RBN with the map showing where we were being heard, and m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00312.html (10,062 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contesting - A Summary (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:22:20 -0400
What's wonderful about this world, Paul, is that you are free to express your ideas... no matter how long you beat the concept to death. If you follow what is happening with the CQ Contest committee,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00326.html (15,426 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contesting - A Summary (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:29:10 -0400
I figured you would not answer the question. Anyway, I have no particular aversion with W2LC's assertion, other than we don't need new rules -- the rules already state that you must be appropriately
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00330.html (11,128 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] New shack computer? (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 20:30:33 -0400
Hi Gary, Writing you this on a Thinkpad X61 Laptop running Windows 7 64-bit edition, with 4 GB RAM. Works perfect for N1MM, etc. Just be aware that their may not be 64-bit drivers for everything. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00066.html (8,661 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] New shack computer? (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 09:16:37 -0400
Under Windows 7 64-bit, 32-bit applications run fine under the WOW layer of 64-bit Wndows. (The 32-bit apps get installed in the Program Files (x86) directory.) Where you can run into problems is wit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00074.html (11,228 bytes)

76. Re: [CQ-Contest] Running ID (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:59:03 -0500
The irony in this is that the entire world was in the pileup. Did the operator even acknowledge the comment? Nope, and didn't identify either. This is a hard problem to solve, and can probably only b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00080.html (12,410 bytes)

77. [CQ-Contest] QRZ Orlando (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 16:41:40 -0500
I'll be at the Microsoft Live 360 Conference in Orlando Monday - Thursday this week. If any contesters are going, or any locals want to get together for a cold one, let me know. 73, Gerry Hull, W1VE
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00165.html (6,678 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Skimmertalk] RBN Stats (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:12:49 -0500
I wish people would use my node more -- taking some load from you Dave, ARCluster had no issues. Mine is in the cloud, with many gigabits of bandwidth. Either dxc.w1ve.com or w1ve.com works. It used
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00258.html (10,048 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending Your Callsign During A Run (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 07:58:27 -0500
100% agree, Pete. I would admit that I'm a very aggressive CQer while running ... no more than a second or two between CQs with no answer... However, I was using full QSK and Identifying after every
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00331.html (10,611 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Teams (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:41:11 -0500
Like the theme, Ward... How about this as an outside-the-box simple example of a new contest: -Form inter-continental virtual teams -intra-team QSOs count zero points -rest of scoring matches a curre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00121.html (11,407 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu