Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:gerry@yccc.org: 285 ]

Total 285 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where have all the young ones gone? (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 08:13:17 -0400
With 3830, we pretty much know the results, as long as people post their score. If you explain that knowing how you placed takes a year without telling them any other aspect of the story, sure, it pu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-04/msg00185.html (11,742 bytes)

122. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 10:29:14 -0400
If winning is the only goal, then being beat by a cheater is a real downer. If you finish #2 behind a cheater, and they are not caught, you are still the winner among your peers. Yes, it does not go
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00092.html (12,171 bytes)

123. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40 Meters SSB (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 10:56:50 -0400
Albert, Extra class hams in mainland USA have a lower band-edge of 7.125 for SSB,. so no issue, unless they are below that frequency (7128 for safety). If an op accidentally transmits below 7125 due
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00125.html (9,785 bytes)

124. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 10:59:02 -0400
Ignorance of the law is not an excuse, but I bet 100% of those calling you, Ed, are clicking on a spot and not realizing it is split. Gerry _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00126.html (15,047 bytes)

125. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 12:03:51 -0400
It takes less than 1/2 second to say "out of band" if someone calls you and they are out of band. I presume you do this, Ed. Not pointing at you. However, the station who accepts QSOs from an out-of-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00131.html (16,189 bytes)

126. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest PCs (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 14:37:57 -0400
Mike, I've built a LOT of contesting computers form off-lease Dell boxes; they are all very good as far as RF interference. Generally, they are sold for office environments, where they must meet more
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00168.html (11,273 bytes)

127. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest PCs (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 17:02:14 -0400
Thanks, Mike -- you are right. But, in the commerical PCs, the RFI shielding tends to be much better -- don't get that. I know it's a cost issue on the "home" pcs. Thanks for the reminder! 73, Gerry
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00178.html (12,892 bytes)

128. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest PCs (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 19:39:47 -0400
Agreed, Ron! Put a $100 Samsung 850 256G SSD in those 755's and they wiil boot Windows 7/8 in 3 seconds. Turns an OK PC into a rocket. 73, Gerry W1VE _______________________________________________ C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00278.html (13,536 bytes)

129. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 15:22:09 -0400
Sunshine is the best remedy. The single best act Randy has done is making the logs public. Now, crowd sourcing of log review is a pretty simple effort. SDR + RBN + crowdsourcing: pretty much no way t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00335.html (10,076 bytes)

130. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed rules changes (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 21:32:21 -0400
"Diddly-squat" That's how much resources are required to record a contest. http://www.hamradiomap.com/qsorder/ QSORecorder works with N1MM, and records the content of every completed QSO -- storing a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00496.html (11,774 bytes)

131. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPXCW & "running" in the Extra band segments? (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 07:30:39 -0400
Hi Dave, I understand your frustration. However, WPX is world-wide, and a lot of good stuff is in in the lower 25KHz. Unless it is daytime in the US, the percentage of stations to work (as US general
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00004.html (8,461 bytes)

132. Re: [CQ-Contest] Win 10 (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 21:11:15 -0400
I've been running it for about 5 months, on both a Parallels VM on Mac, as well as a Quadcore Intel desktop. I've been using N1MM and N1MM+ on it, and find no issues at all. If you don't like the Win
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00016.html (10,151 bytes)

133. [CQ-Contest] RoverStatus.info -- Tweet location and status information to APRS and DX Clusters... (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 07:04:26 -0400
Fellow Contesters, This is for those interested in VHF, UHF and Microwave contesting. The ARRL has changed the rules for self-spotting above 50 MHz. You can now self spot. However, because different
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00095.html (7,858 bytes)

134. Re: [CQ-Contest] VHF Contest - Self Spotting (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:57:34 -0400
Ed, you missed the memo. http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-board-okays-changes-to-dxcc-program-vhf-and-above-contesting-rules I've been doing VHF contests at a very high level for almost 30 years. Some Q
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00099.html (10,109 bytes)

135. Re: [CQ-Contest] VHF Contest - Self Spotting (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:07:33 -0400
Lots of great comments here. No "wrong" opinions. We all see the value of this experiment differently. Yes, a spot from a guy 150 miles away not be of help to a small station on 6 meters... but that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00104.html (9,704 bytes)

136. [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualification -- LP vs HP M/S ARRL DX... (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:14:20 -0400
I know this won't change, but the committee blew it regarding ARRL DX and M/S... M/S is only one class. So, you can only operate HP to get max qualification points for WRTC2018? That does not make se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00106.html (7,212 bytes)

137. Re: [CQ-Contest] Beginner Contester Flyer (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:18:14 -0400
Lots of EMCOM types at FD: "In order to be good at EMCOM, you must first be a great communicator. Contesters win by being effective communicators. They know how to build radio systems that are heard,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00180.html (11,806 bytes)

138. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:33:38 -0400
Well, I won't be doing SO2R, but I am doing something "on the edge". FD is a great time to show people new things. At our field day, K1BKE (K1B this year), we will be running 4A in NH. I'll be doing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00181.html (11,730 bytes)

139. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:12:58 -0400
Nope, I got a club call, so J would not have to do with the QSLs. VY1AAA will be used for the remote ops from J's station. 74, Gerry W1VE _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00186.html (13,401 bytes)

140. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 21:12:17 -0400
LOL! Mike, I have club calls in NF, ON and YT. It allows me to operate without signing portable. (Hate long calls in contests!) A good thing. As I said in a previous email, it relieves the QSL burden
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00191.html (12,013 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu