Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:g3ww.dez@gmail.com: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Classic Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Dez <g3ww.dez@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:04:48 +0000
Am I missing something, only there seems to be quite a number of CQWW SSB logs already uploaded which have the Classic overlay but are claiming Assisted. Perhaps I missed something in the rules! Dez,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00289.html (6,656 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Linux Logging Programs (score: 1)
Author: Dez Watson <g3ww.dez@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:09:38 +0100
Tim, I have run the contest logger Win-Test in Linux Ubuntu using the Wine emulator. There is some documentation to help sett up Win-Test under Linux at the following link: http://docs.win-test.com/w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00113.html (7,647 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Linux Logging Programs (score: 1)
Author: Dez Watson <g3ww.dez@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:33:42 +0100
Hi Jim et al, Well I didn't explicitly say Win-Test is better than N1MM+, simply I think Win-Test is worth the fee. For sure, N1MM+ is a wonderful contest logger, which is supported really well and I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00129.html (10,287 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Own skimmer ok? (score: 1)
Author: Dez Watson <g3ww.dez@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:14:06 +0100
This is Yuri's interpretation, so nothing has changed AFAIK. Quite rightly most of the major contest sponsors class skimmers, both local and remote, as Assistance. Skimmers are a such massive game ch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00251.html (7,199 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Contest simulation using RBN archives (score: 1)
Author: Dez Watson <g3ww.dez@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:53:41 +0100
Hi, There are tools out there to analyse archived RBN data, ViewProp is one such program which springs to mind. This is great for analysing propagation and planning contest strategies using real data
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00126.html (7,535 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Dez Watson <g3ww.dez@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 09:51:37 +0100
Dear Bob, In the data analysis world, we have a well known proverb, "If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything". Bob,I'm sorry to hear what you've had to endure for the last se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00010.html (16,317 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX CW 2016 Results (score: 1)
Author: Dez Watson <g3ww.dez@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 01:16:39 +0000
Is it just me, or is processing the CQ WPX CW 2016 results and UBN reports running late this year? I realise the results from the May contest are in CQ Magzine, and the line scores are on-line. Howev
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00095.html (7,651 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't EU stations use the RBN feeds? (score: 1)
Author: Dez Watson <g3ww.dez@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:03:03 +0000
Interesting thread this, Im enjoying it. Here are some of my thoughts. I usually enter assisted in CW contests and use the RBN feed but I rather think the RBN has become a victim of its own success.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00195.html (10,727 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Recording (score: 1)
Author: Dez Watson <g3ww.dez@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:33:41 +0000
You either abide by the contest rules, or not. You choose to make a recording, or not. Lets just suppose the contest adjudicators spot anomalies in a log. To say you didnt make an audio recording bec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-01/msg00207.html (10,295 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu