Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:frugoli@worldlinkisp.com: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting tips (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 21:42:08 -0500
IMHO, much of contesting is personal and based on your own experience of what works best. I think the best contesting tip is get your butt in the chair and keep it there. Practice, practice, practice
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00505.html (10,610 bytes)

2. Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] 10 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 17:07:33 -0500
I truly believe that ten meters is open more often than people think it is. 15 and 20 are usually pretty solid, so folks are there rag chewing or chasing DX. 10 is not as utilized because it's not a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00169.html (12,094 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: Contest IMing (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:55:34 -0500
I can't imagine paying much attention to anything but the radio and the logging software when the rates go way up (over 200/hour) as a single op. Now add in paying attention to the 2nd radio (SO2R) a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00369.html (11,264 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] saving us from ourselves (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 20:12:36 -0500
Computer interfaces are a godsend on 40 and 80. That's my answer to save us. I never touch the split button on my rig anymore, I just hit the "-" key and enter the correct fequency (if it wasn't in t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00097.html (12,344 bytes)

5. Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] saving us from ourselves (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:46:30 -0500
Knowing your radio is great, and essential. However it's clear (both from experience and listening on the bands) that after 24-30 hours straight (2nd night) remembering to set splits and not transmit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00180.html (12,213 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW VS. PHONE (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:37:05 -0500
I don't think there will or needs to be any change in the phone bands. Both parts of bands get crowded at times (contests mainly). I think the problems with phone in the "wrong" places will go away l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00206.html (9,886 bytes)

7. Re: RE: [CQ-Contest] Response to K5ZD's comments (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:16:59 -0500
I see two issues here. 1. Create another category so more folks have a chance at wallpaper 2. a way to run a contest "seriously" without killing your weekend (and putting other parts of your life in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00269.html (14,387 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] DX Sprint is a good idea (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:45:23 -0500
I like the idea! Maybe it's a 24 hour contest but you can only operate 6 hours. Count multipliers only once (not once per band) to encourage operation during the high band openings where the rate is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00387.html (12,282 bytes)

9. Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:22:02 -0500
Let's not loose the focus on this one guys. This is a good topic, worthy of good discussion. Here's some thoughts on why it can't be changed (none of which I believe by the way): 1 - just plain old
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00586.html (9,809 bytes)

10. Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:36:09 -0500
Whoa! I think most favor the rules being enforced, not just doing away with packet because contesters sometimes break that rule. If we follow that logic we should do away with the 10 minute rule, bec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00588.html (8,989 bytes)

11. Re: Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 16:16:42 -0500
I would agree 100%. Here's my argument though. If somebody wants to get on for an hour and point and shoot, more power to them. It's some easy q's for both the spotted stations and the s&per. If some
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00020.html (12,787 bytes)

12. Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 12:58:04 -0500
Unless of course these "fly in ops" can't have a station at home due to CC&R's, or they are apartment dwellers. Not everyone has the desire to or is lucky enough to grow towers in their backyard. 73
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00036.html (9,557 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Running vs SP (Was Self Spotting) (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:02:11 -0500
Rate dictates this, not some external rule imposed by contesters or sponsors. If you can run, run. If everyone is running, you won't be able to, so you're rate will drop and you'll s&p. We've already
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00037.html (10,808 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Run vs S&P (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:08:57 -0500
A very good point was made about Run frequencies not being relinquished when a station moves to S&P. SO2R is one example, and now many MM stations are utilizing a 2nd station on a band for S&P operat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00038.html (7,937 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 12:18:36 -0400
If another station is on your frequency it will definetly hurt somebody's rate. It probably depends on who is louder in the prime target area. If you're louder, the other stations run will slow down
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00139.html (11,485 bytes)

16. [WriteLog] Looking for a programer for rig control project (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:57:45 -0400
Hello fellow contesters. I'm looking for someone to program a Rig Driver and Front Panel for the Kenwood TS-940 to use with Writelog that impliments all the CAT functions of the 940. If there is anyo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00273.html (7,456 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 21:16:12 -0400
I hope all of you who have posted on this topic to the reflector have also e-mailed the contest advisory committee with your comments. Also, we should consider some other options, such as are there c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00044.html (11,746 bytes)

18. Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 11:08:56 -0400
I actually think Eric's idea might be the best one I've heard, sending the exchange from the last station you worked. Everyone could start off using their postal code (everyone in the world has one,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00050.html (11,284 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 21:27:51 -0400
How is this hard to explain. "Send to the next guy what you recieved in the previous exchange" seems to cover it pretty well. Furthermore, little harm would be done if the casual contester just sent
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00066.html (10,125 bytes)

20. Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 08:51:58 -0400
Same way we do now, post the rules online in a clear concise format. Just has to be clear that your log MUST reflect the exchange you send for each qso in order to be scored correctly. Seems easy eno
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00074.html (10,862 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu