Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] UQ2GJN (score: 1)
Author: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 19:56:34 -0800 (PST)
Hi everyone;      This isn't strictly a contest question.  I am a recent user of LoTW and eQSL and I am now moving some of my contacts and cards into the data bases.       I worked and have the card
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00209.html (7,354 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stew Perry Scores (score: 1)
Author: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:32:39 -0800 (PST)
Hi all; -- Original Message -- ... Just sitting and reading the posts, but the above text in bold is what caught my eye!  hi, hi!! 73, Scott AA0AA _______________________________________________ CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00225.html (7,850 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Fw: Stew Perry Scores (score: 1)
Author: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:35:56 -0800 (PST)
The server reformatted my message and the line came out as it was originally (a web link) and took out the bold letters, so I better be more explicit:  check the address- it contains "rat/stew"!  ...
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00233.html (8,431 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] EU PSK DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Scott <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 18:59:34 -0500
Hi All--I am pulling my hair out! Only a few more days left and I can't find a program that supports the European PSK contest to put it in the correct Cabrillo format! And this is when I think I scor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00160.html (6,704 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in contests-an observation (score: 1)
Author: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 20:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Last weekend I was searching around for some DX while the Hawaii QSO contest was running.  I had the cluster active so I could keep an eye on that while I was listening near the Hawaiian stations hop
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00365.html (9,241 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in contests-an observation (score: 1)
Author: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
At first I thought that the station might have mis-spotted himself to gain attention and more contacts, but when he started getting upset about the rude behavior I changed my mind!  And, he was IDing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00389.html (11,916 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARROGANCE AND GOING SPLIT (score: 1)
Author: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 10:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
N6TJ wrote: If we're not employing the latest technology, we're dinosaurs. 73, Scott  AA0AA; XE1/AA0AA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00003.html (8,621 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mulan DXC Worked All Chinese Provinces Contest 2012 Oct. 6, from 0000-2359 UTC. (score: 1)
Author: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 21:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Working China? Well, I am a relative novice to DXing with a temporary antenna in a poor location (mountains all around) and only 100 watts (which mostly heat the mountains, I imagine!), but 01 Oct I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00060.html (9,773 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Different Location, (score: 1)
Author: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:41:08 -0800 (PST)
Hi all;      My Mexican license is XE1/AA0AA and my U.S. license (obviously) is AA0AA.  I am not "portable" in Mexico--I can apply to have a portable station (i.e., 2 meters, etc.) but the license on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00014.html (9,955 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite - my 2 cents (score: 1)
Author: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 08:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Hi all; That's Ok because it is for "NA" to work others (it is the ARRl's contest and even though I am a long-time member it is not for me to tell "them" how to run their contest!), but it was disapp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00080.html (10,671 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey - my comment (score: 1)
Author: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
Glenn, you exactly expressed my feelings, though I had never put them to words!  From my qth I cannot compete with anyone (except maybe the guy loading a wet noodle! hi, hi) but I enjoy getting in a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00422.html (17,040 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2013 North Dakota QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:22:23 -0500
I also was looking forward to working ND and SD. I was able to find only 1 ND station on ssb, which I could 't work, 2 on CW, 1of which I worked. By pure chance I say a strange trace on the P3 just 2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00361.html (8,228 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
Author: Scott <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:00:24 -0600
I think I just found a new business--selling automatic Iders to contesters! Remember the ones we constructed to connect to 2m rigs back when repeaters were still not that common? The CW version would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00051.html (12,048 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates (score: 1)
Author: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:25:35 -0800 (PST)
I am about 47% confirmed on LoTW and much lower on eQSL (although not calculated, country list is shorter).  DX (outside NA) confirms more often on LoTW, and, over all, digital QSOs are confirmed muc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00135.html (9,502 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates (score: 1)
Author: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:20:17 -0800 (PST)
That is interesting Yan.  Maybe the false QSLs are to get a more rare call.  Some report that they get lots of false calls--many complaints from the W-region!  I have never received any false QSLs in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00152.html (11,006 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates (score: 1)
Author: Scott <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:09:55 -0600
I use fldigi for digital, which uploads directly to RUMlog if it is open, and use MacLoggerDx for some contests. None of them upload directly to LoTW, but do so to eQSL. However, each produces adif f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00157.html (11,506 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is CQ Magazine still in Business (score: 1)
Author: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:36:41 -0800 (PST)
I suggest that you do what I did.  After 3 yrs of only getting 1 or 2 numbers a year, I noticed an offer to subscribe to the electronic version for half price or so.  I jumped right on it  and ever s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00193.html (11,122 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu