Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] It's not the sunspots, folks (score: 1)
Author: Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 14:49:44 -0400
Yeah, CQ WW SSB was tough. I was hoping to pick up Zone 2 on 160m, but I heard none of the active stations - even when they were spotted. Unfortunately the declining portion of a solar cycle (where w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00011.html (7,783 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] It's not the sunspots, folks (score: 1)
Author: Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:58:01 -0400
"So when we double the frequency from 160m to 75/80m, the ionospheric absorption decreases by one fourth. It would decrease even more (by one sixteenth) on 40m." I should made it more clear by saying
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00021.html (7,635 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] NCJ missing pages (score: 1)
Author: Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 11:05:11 -0400
Hmmm, my copy has pages 17-24. Carl K9LA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00096.html (6,614 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] F2 region trends due to changes in the Earth's magnetic field (score: 1)
Author: Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 16:28:22 -0400
Ken AB1J asked: Has the magnetic polar drift affected propagation over the decades?? I'm aware of two papers that have looked at this. They not only looked at the orientation of the magnetic field, b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00034.html (7,964 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu