contest from my station using his callsign. WPX guest operators/calls sometimes create problems which may differ for plaques versus certificates since they are taken care of by two different entities
a comment period under which concerned parties may file comments and depending on the results of the comments the FCC will take final action. From the FCC's NPRM itself: Adopted: May 2, 2002: Release
You should definitely stack them vertically. This will give you versatility in takeoff angle selection if you can feed either separately or both in phase (maybe even both out of phase). If you stack
This is amazing! The number of people and calls and faces showing up from all over the world - some familiar from the log and some familiar from face-to-face meetings past - boggles the mind. It's li
Here's a copy of a message I put on the DX List: "While on the subject of the new 5 MHz and 137 kHz bands, ARRL summarized the FCC's NPRM here: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2002/05/15/100/ In par
http://www.wrtc2002.org/rules_all.htm Logs: Only e-mail logs (ASCII) are accepted. The preferred log formats are Cabrillo, CT.ALL and TR.DAT. The "Early Bird" logs should be submitted by 18.00 UTC on
Ward, N0AX reports: On the Bus with WRTC - #2 - 11 July 2002 Yesterday was a fun day - introductions, bus rides, cold beer (there's a heat wave in Finland this week), and great food. Now we are seein
Wow! Is this cool or what! PP5JR/PY1KN off to a huge lead after the first hour...almost so huge I wonder if there was a mistake! http://wrtc.jouni.net/cgi-bin/tilanne.pl?hpng=WRTC 73, Bill W4ZV
Ward, N0AX reports: Well, here I am back on the bus to Helsinki after a fast-paced couple of days at the Himos resort with all the other WRTC participants. We are a little bit tired--some are dozing
Hold on pardners! The WRTC website is now showing N5TJ/K1TO #1, DL2CC/DL6FBL #2, and N6TJ/N6AA # 15 at 1.411 Meg (down from 1.747 Meg originally)! There may have been some problem with the realtime N
The detailed breakdown for N6TJ/N6AA shows the following sequence, only the last of which is posted, even though it is an earlier time. May be some problem with the posting process since the progress
It's all over now! The IARU HF Championship is over as of a couple hours ago and the team and I are packing our things and loading them into OH2BAH's car for the short ride back to Helsinki and the g
This past weekend was the annual running of the IARU HF Championship in which 52 top-notch two-man teams from all over the world competed in the fourth running of the World Radio Team Championships
In thinking about the WRTC 2002, the Finns certainly deserve our thanks for making the playing field as level as it has ever been by using identical antennas at the same height over flat terrain with
K4OJ: isn't a better node! This is also true on the low bands. Proof - compare alltime SOSB records for CW vs SSB on 160-40 in the CQ WW records here: http://www.cqww.com/intro.htm CW and SSB weekend
Hi George! through the noise on these bands - I think that more of the score diffrences can be attributed to these problems: 1 - Lack of ssb frequency alignment on the low bands. This forces the use
to move to the new modes and leave what he considers are obsolete modes. And exactly what are his credentials? Do you think he has any idea he knows what he is talking about? I don't. http://www.fcc.
EI5DI replied to K4JRB: ** This is correct, but it is irrelevant because PSK31, and other data modes, cannot be decoded by the human ear alone. Then, whatever it is, it's not amateur radio - pehaps i
which is not even close to the typical CW or SSB SOAB scores. My apologies to K3MM at P40MM who made 2972 QSO's in the low power category which will be the new SOABHP World record, but my point still