Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:artinian@siol.net: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Smart ARRL robot (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Mon Jan 7 22:52:39 2002
I received the following error report from ARRL Cabrillo robot which made me laugh. I omitted ARRL section, abbreviated Roundup to RU and added known keywords -POWER RTTY to category line. I stand by
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00083.html (8,179 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] AA6TY RU or, "Life in Smallsville" (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Mon Jan 7 23:06:45 2002
I am looking forward to the day when Bruce, ZF2NT learns to use UP for RX. I was lectured in CW pile-up when I tried tailend calling technique which works fine with better contesters. 73 de Mario, S5
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00084.html (8,474 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Re: Topband: TOP BAND RECEIVING ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Tue Jan 8 13:51:13 2002
Low band receiving antenna efficiency is limited by outside noise which should be received some 10 dB stronger then own RX noise. This is very easy to achieve with any of the present solid state RX
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00090.html (8,600 bytes)

4. Topband: Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: Topband: TOP BAND RECEIVING ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Tue Jan 8 20:22:36 2002
We assume that atmospheric noise is evenly distributed in the space around us. Very directional and efficient antenna will exibit high gain and pickup that much MORE noise. Inefficient antenna will
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00097.html (10,624 bytes)

5. Topband: Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: Topband: TOP BAND RECEIVING ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Tue Jan 8 21:13:29 2002
Having consulted OC Matjaz, S53MV, I must make the following correction: Directivity has NO influence on received isotropic noise power. Received signal to isotropic noise ratio is therefore independ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00099.html (10,786 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Receiver Gain (Was TOP BAND RECEIVING ANTENNAS) (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Tue Jan 8 23:02:08 2002
The latest ARRL test of ICOM 756 PRO II shows reasonable HF RX sensitivity figures. Also notice significant PLL noise reduction. IMD3 leaves about 10 dB room for improvement. Most of the previous tes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00101.html (11,256 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Contest RF Capabilities (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Wed Jan 9 19:44:01 2002
Wonderful news! Now my Italian friends can legally use 3CX6000 with 7V/78A for heating :-) 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU Footer** stesso o prohibited statements the contents -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00129.html (12,255 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Re: Linears in the closet (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Fri Mar 15 22:57:45 2002
Unfortunately this is not the case but it is not known to many hams! 100 W radio uses 200 W pair of transistors which exibit minimum distortion levels at half power output. Spurious transmitter produ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00304.html (8,957 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] W3AU SK (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Sun May 18 12:33:11 2003
K3LR wrote: Bob, K3EST was living in K3ZO's house at the time and K3TW was there as well. I remember visiting ZO's house with Dr. Pepper bottles everywhere and two Drake B-lines that were always lit,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00178.html (6,872 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Orion (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Sun May 18 12:57:49 2003
WD4K wrote: Orion/Loaded 1000MP, the Orion makes my beloved MP, look, sound and feel like an old toy. JA toys usually look and feel better then USA counterparts :-) MP sound can be greatly improved b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00179.html (7,481 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] WAE packet (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Tue Jun 3 09:15:23 2003
These were the days of packet radio and DX Cluster beginings. DL had a clear tech advantage which is leveled now by internet. WAE tries to promote tough low band DX by higher mults. Spoting helps EU
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00039.html (6,798 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Re: Just say no (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Tue Jun 3 09:33:30 2003
K4OJ wrote: A contester takes on other contesters in the hopes that he is engaging in a fair battle - a level playing field if you will. There are two possible approaches to contesting: Olympian with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00041.html (7,383 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] WAE - the most intelligent contest (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Tue Jun 3 20:26:56 2003
DL3YBM wrote: waedc1992 977 467 420 90 waedc1993 1142 548 484 110 waedc1994 981 483 408 90 waedc1995 920 447 369 104 waedc1996 1054 464 436 154 waedc1997 1099 494 460 145 waedc1998 1317 576 558 183 w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00057.html (6,889 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] Dedicated to my USA friends (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Tue Jun 3 20:47:30 2003
Number 29. The Olympians Insofar as competition is the measure of oneself against another, it entails the view that the other is more important than oneself. Otherwise, it would be sufficient to meas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00058.html (9,047 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Dedicated to my USA friends (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Wed Jun 4 11:18:37 2003
Feel free to enter your comments about hamradio as an unique competition at: http://www.philosophers.co.uk/cgi-local/discus/show.cgi?10/36 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU, HF competitor with a lot of fun jus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00064.html (8,013 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Re: YM vs OM (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Wed Jun 4 17:56:45 2003
K3FT wrote: A YM with packet will NEVER beat at OM with packet. Please note that WRTC-2002 #4 place was taken by WWYC team who participated for the first time in the event! The first three places wer
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00067.html (6,297 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Wed Jun 4 18:01:46 2003
WWYC N4GI wrote: I think the legalization of automatic self-spotting is the only rational answer. What a piece of wisdom from YM! 10 minutes limit per self-spot will do. Easy to program... 73 de Mari
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00068.html (6,353 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Re: Packet - THE solution (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Wed Jun 4 18:24:44 2003
K5NA wrote: Using packet (assisted) doesn't mean you will always (absolutely) be beaten by the single-op purists. You just have to use packet smartly and be a good operator to win as assisted. This N
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00069.html (6,795 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] Re: Competition is.. (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Wed Jun 4 18:48:21 2003
I am born again competitor now! 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00071.html (8,439 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] Re: SCOURGES OF CONTESTING, CHAPTER 2 (score: 1)
Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A)
Date: Tue Jun 10 20:09:29 2003
perpetration of the ABSOLUTE DISGRACE called 'packet', I say shame shame on you. OC Jim, you might have developed a different view of the freedom of information provided by internet and packet (and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00153.html (6,558 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu