Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:anders@erols.com: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contesting, Ham Radio and the Internet (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Tue Jan 15 00:42:00 2002
-- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00338.html (11,459 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] How to address the ARRL (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Tue Jan 22 01:42:12 2002
Dave: Yours is a very fair and professional response. I agree that there are more effective and less effective ways to address to ARRL, and you make your point well. The recent letter by Walt Stinson
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00435.html (7,794 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Tue Jan 22 01:22:48 2002
My sentiments, exactly, Gary! For the record, my biases are similar to yours, Gary--I am also a LM of ARRL since the 60's, active on HF and VHF; CW, SSB, RTTY and PSK31; and have a special interest i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00439.html (20,259 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Wed Jan 23 18:19:10 2002
Someone pointed out I didn't give my call. Wasn't trying to be anonymous. de Rol, K3RA -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00491.html (22,282 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Wed Jan 23 21:33:17 2002
Jim: Thank you for anwering my email, and for giving me the chance to be involved in the decision making of the ARRL. I am a strong supporter of the League, and have been for the 44 years I have been
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00502.html (16,418 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Thu Jun 1 00:40:54 2000
There is no question about it, you can't do it! FD Rule 4.1.1 states "This station may only be operated by Novice/Technician Plus licensees." Oddly enough, I couldn't find any reference in this year'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00000.html (8,166 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Fri Jun 2 08:51:34 2000
I suspect Bob is correct about the future. The FD rules have long made an allowance for canadians FD'ers, where there are no novice or tech plus licenses. For VE's, the novice/tech station is to be s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00045.html (9,839 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Fri Jun 2 09:00:39 2000
I agree with Neal EXCEPT, once again I must point out that the control operator concept is an FCC rule but we are talking about a more restrictive FD rule set by the FCC (as Bob, N5NJ points out). Th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00047.html (11,843 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Fri Jun 2 09:16:24 2000
See my and Bob N5NJ's answers to the no-code, non-licensed operation of the novice/tech plus station--it ain't legal according to the ARRL rules. (Though it would be ok with the FCC, the ARRL does no
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00054.html (10,898 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Novice/Tech + Station at Field Day (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Mon Jun 5 23:03:03 2000
That was in reference to an extra running a novices station in the FD as the main station, and clarified the definition of a control operator. It was not in reference to the "free" novice station. Ag
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00134.html (8,072 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Hey...chill out! It's a contest! It's VHF and it's just fine withme. (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Tue Apr 20 00:37:42 1999
AY-MEN to that, Ty. And you didn't mention the outta nowhere sporadic E openings on 6 meters (better than ten even!) plus the meteor pings that give you one shot at the call and grid--if you are luck
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00170.html (9,853 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Re: CW SS QSO (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Thu Dec 17 16:28:01 1998
Good idea. As many know, years ago ARRL DID accept DX Contest Logs for DXCC. Wonder why they don't consider accepting computer logs and at least give credit for those that can be confirmed electronic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00138.html (8,353 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu