Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:adam@kenbrio.com: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Encouraging Casual Participation in Contests (score: 1)
Author: Adam Mercier <adam@kenbrio.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 09:02:55 -0500
Taking your math at face value, let's assume it's $500 for the physical cards. That figure makes the $120 seem less of a big deal. However.... It's not a question of total cost, but the distribution
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00453.html (16,109 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW slow? No problem (score: 1)
Author: Adam Mercier <adam@kenbrio.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:33:50 -0700
Thank you, Scott. Im not a CW contester (I prefer phone and RTTY contests) mostly because I have a 15 wpm ear, and my decoding software doesnt do well on 30+ wpm. I decided to give this contest a try
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00381.html (13,132 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW slow? No problem (score: 1)
Author: Adam Mercier <adam@kenbrio.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:01:50 -0700
Does high-speed CW have a place in contesting? Absolutely! I dont think anyone would argue that. However, I think youd agree that CQing with no answers (which happens to even the mega-stations later
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00403.html (15,321 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu