Here's a follow-up regarding RTTY QSLing via LoTW. You may recall I said I had better than a 25% return rate in less than 24 hours after the chads had settled in the chad box (old timer). Last week I
I'm not certain where to ask this question, but there's a pretty good depth of 'ham history knowledge' available on this reflector... Is there (or was there) US Amateur callbooks published in the 192
CQ Contesters, QST! I will be running the CQWW DX RTTY contest this weekend using the Special Event callsign KØD. Although these 1x1 callsigns are becoming more prevalent on the bands, you mig
Doing a quick Google search, I came up with this source: http://www.hobid.com/vem/323.html To find it on the page use Ctrl+F to do a search. The part is listed near the end of the page. I see someone
During the CQWW DX Phone contest last weekend I got the dreaded "QSO before" reply to one of my S&P calls. I never made it into their log. We have discussed that situation many times on this reflecto
Bob, You're preaching to the choir here, so I've cc'ed this message to the CQ-Contest reflector where the contesting community hangs out! 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN I do a lot of contesting. I'm n
Mike - WØMU said, in part: "We have enough classes already." Sorry Mike, but this is a minority opinion according to two recent surveys. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN -- ORIGINAL THREAD -- Mes
I have posted an ARRL Contest Log Analyzer tool on my website at http://chudek.aberon.net Look in the "Files - Spreadsheets" album, then go into the "Contest Log Analyzers" folder. You will find 3 *.
Dallas - W3PP said, in part: "I don't have a dog in this fight,..." Well I do have a dog in this fight. He's a Chihuahua and is pretty much down and out of action in the opening seconds of competitio
"I'm not saying it will not work ... I am saying the effort is considerably more involved than 10 or 12 receivers scattered around the world. 73, ... Joe, W4TV" ... and then they strung wires to the
RTTY Contesters, I have uploaded an Excel spreadsheet for the OK-OM RTTY DX Contest to my website: http://chudek.aberon.net Click on the "Files - Spreadsheets" album then select the "Log Analyzer" fo
"If the other person on the next table is not logging, holding a freq, operating or otherwise, why would that be multi-op?" My opinion: It's two people in the physical environment and the psychologic
Dave, Dave, Dave... I would care. Others would care. The CQWW committee would care... 151 Watts would be unsportsmanlike and definitely would fall into the class of cheating if the operator claimed L
The ARRL RTTY Roundup kicks off at 18:00 UTC on January 5, 2008. You will find the rules here: http://www.arrl.org/contests/rules/2008/rtty.html Now might be a good time to review and compare your ol
2. Date and Contest Period: First full weekend of January, but never on January 1. Begins 1800 UTC Saturday, ends 2400 UTC Sunday (January 5-6, 2008). 1.. 2.1. Operate no more than 24 hours. 2.. 2.2.
nz, What's that you say, you're in TX??? Dang, I gotta go fix my log... again! Geez, I'm glad I've got 30 days to get all this stuff sorted out. :-) What caught my attention this year was the handful
Zack... No I did not know that! Thanks for posting the information and links. This information helps reinforce my position that the (ingenious, forward looking, important, useful, priceless, add your
"As a Single-Op, I could watch what a multi-multi is doing (who is posting their breakdown) on which bands and make my band selection based on that information. If I'm running on 20, and I see their
I didn't say cheating was a non-issue. I said the scoreboard is a non-issue. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN How is cheating a non-issue? I am anxious to be better informed. 73, Bob W5OV --Original Mes
Lee, et.al., Our MWA member (Dave Ranney - KTØR - sk) who we just paid tribute to during NAQP was a very effective SO2R competitor from a small city lot. He also ran many Multi Op sessions wit