Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:JPescatore@aol.com: 57 ]

Total 57 documents matching your query.

41. [CQ-Contest] RSGB "Litmus Test" on Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 05:43:12 -0400 (EDT)
The RSGB appears to be facilitating a discussion around general contest rules in RSGB contests. Only open to RSGB members, but looks like a nice way to get broader contester input into any potential
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00218.html (7,066 bytes)

42. [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 05:51:16 -0400 (EDT)
I've submitted a simple Yes/No "Should the NAQP contests add DC as a multiplier" survey request to the Contesting.com survey manager. Would be nice to just have a simple straw poll vote. John K3TN __
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00220.html (7,904 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Filtering VE7CC Spots for SS (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 05:03:09 -0500 (EST)
The Spokane DX Association has a nice writeup that walks you through setting up the VE7CC software - look here. The VE7CC online manual also shows it graphically here. 73 John K3TN __________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00148.html (6,721 bytes)

44. [CQ-Contest] Have NCCC and PVRC ruined SS? Nope (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 05:26:22 -0500 (EST)
On the PVRC side, PVRC going whole hog in SS greatly increases the number of MD, NC and VA stations, with a minor increase in WV, PA and DE. So, the only contest ops that might feel SS is less fun wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00001.html (8,263 bytes)

45. [CQ-Contest] Changing the Rules (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:35:38 -0500 (EST)
Changing the rules in SS to make Sunday more fun for those who enter full time is a very old discussion. Rightly so, it always ends with "Work 'em once per contest is one part of what makes SS SS" No
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00070.html (7,286 bytes)

46. [CQ-Contest] Sumarizing the SS Thread (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 06:20:53 -0500 (EST)
Summary of what we have learned so far: 1. The once per band QSO rule is one of the things that makes SS unique, but causes Sunday to be a grind *for those who choose to operate full time.* 2. There
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00206.html (8,556 bytes)

47. [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:41:34 -0500 (EST)
Skimmer accuracy had gotten much better, but it is certainly not perfect yet. The accuracy of the spots coming from the RBN are generally higher than those coming from human beings. There are techniq
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00395.html (7,549 bytes)

48. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer spots compared to human spots (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:04:00 -0500 (EST)
My experience with accuracy of spots is very different than W5OV's. Using the N1MM software, I have a choice of spot sources,and combinations of sources. When my only choices were the "human driven"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00427.html (8,320 bytes)

49. [CQ-Contest] If Contest X Is Not Your Favorite (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:06:44 -0500 (EST)
This topic "Contest X was boring" comes up periodically on the PVRC email reflector, and I was writing a short piece for the PVRC newsletter to address it. Given the thread here, I wanted to push it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00112.html (6,938 bytes)

50. [CQ-Contest] IN7NEQP Score Exploder? (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 05:44:26 -0400 (EDT)
I used the N1MM IN7NEQP module to play in all 3 state QSO parties this weekend, worked great. But, if I want to report scores to 3830 I guess I could feed the Cabrillo file to each separate QSO party
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00026.html (6,908 bytes)

51. [CQ-Contest] WARC Bands and Contesting: Aargh! FAQ Update (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 05:39:59 -0400 (EDT)
The Contesting Wiki is locked from updates for maintenance right now, but I've created this entry to add to the Aargh! FAQ at http://wiki.contesting.com/index.php/Arrgh_FAQ : The WARC bands are prett
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-08/msg00031.html (7,439 bytes)

52. [CQ-Contest] Automation = freedom from non-essential tasks (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 05:10:48 -0500 (EST)
Two sided coin - I haven't had to shift the transmission in my car for a long time, but I don't think that is really an essential skill. Ditto using matches to start my grill, a hand saw to cut firew
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00209.html (7,143 bytes)

53. [CQ-Contest] Survey: Does streaming your rx audio during the contest violate contest ethics? (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 07:47:08 -0500 (EST)
I've put up a short survey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/3LHG2YP on the ethics of streaming your contest receive audio onto the Internet during the contest. Please take the survey, and I'll publi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00294.html (7,179 bytes)

54. [CQ-Contest] Survey Results: Does Streaming Contest Audio Violate Contest Ethics? (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:57:12 -0500 (EST)
Just over 100 contesters responded to the survey back in December: 50% said streaming contest audio doesn't violate common contest ethics 33% said it does In the long form answers, most felt if some
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00141.html (7,636 bytes)

55. [CQ-Contest] Phonetics for long call signs (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 06:06:22 -0500 (EST)
Dave - as someone who operated with a looong callsign for many years (WB2EKK), just use phonetics for your suffix and not your prefix. That won't change anything when someone has an SO2R auto CQ goin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00061.html (7,059 bytes)

56. [CQ-Contest] Accuracy Top Ten Box (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 05:32:47 -0400 (EDT)
Tree N6TR has published the Top Ten "Golden Logs" box in the CW Sprint Results for years.Rather than calculate percentages, he lists the ten largest logs that were error free. _______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00035.html (8,109 bytes)

57. [CQ-Contest] Detailed Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: jpescatore@aol.com
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 06:30:38 -0400 (EDT)
Other than for Sprints and NAQPs, I've come to realize that 3830scores.com is really where I look for seeing how I did in a contest - going by claimed scores, at least. The only reason to look at the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-07/msg00136.html (7,323 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu