Mail Archive Search: <+from:71111.260@compuserve.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:71111.260@compuserve.com: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

1. Unique uniques! (score: 1): Author: Hans Brakob <71111.260@compuserve.com> (Hans Brakob); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:27 2005; In a copyrighted story, "WA6ITF at the Editors Desk" of NewsLine (#964) reported: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ RECENT PIRATE CALL SIGNS KG0EI reports via pa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00211.html (6,619 bytes)
2. What REALLY makes you good? (score: 1): Author: Hans Brakob <71111.260@compuserve.com> (Hans Brakob); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:34 2005; This message is aimed at the REALLY major-league contesters out there. (Most of you have been far too quiet here on the reflector lately! ) What single thing do you do best, and why is it important t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00568.html (7,939 bytes)
3. 24 Hour Contest Category (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob); Date: Thu Feb 25 13:38:13 1993; First - NO CHANGE IN LENGTH OF CURRENT 48 HOUR CONTESTS!!! But how about a new "24-hour, S/O" category. Yeah, I know, it sounds wimpy. After all, everyone on this reflector is a power contester, and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00176.html (7,692 bytes)
4. Copy of: 24 Hour participants (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob); Date: Mon Mar 1 11:33:34 1993; -- Forwarded Message -- RE: Copy of: 24 Hour participants I vote for a 24 hour category, but vehemently against "CONTIGUOUS". The folks we are trying to draw in to more participation are the folks wh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00007.html (7,702 bytes)
5. 24 hour (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob); Date: Mon Mar 1 16:41:44 1993; Reread the message Trey - not looking for >100, we are looking for the current <100. They currently see 48 hours as "just too much" for whatever reason. If they could compete on a less strenous basis; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00016.html (6,738 bytes)
6. Letter to CAC (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob K0HB); Date: Sun Mar 7 13:37:50 1993; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00065.html (5,834 bytes)
7. Try again! (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob K0HB); Date: Sun Mar 7 17:39:47 1993; Below is a copy of a letter I have sent to CAC to gain reaction, and perhaps start a conversation among the reps. Drop a note to your division rep with your comments. -- C O P Y -- March 4, 1993 . .; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00066.html (12,060 bytes)
8. One last try. (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob K0HB); Date: Mon Mar 8 00:23:17 1993; First time it went with no text. Next time, it was all muddled into one paragraph! Following is a copy of a letter I sent to CAC for comment and discussion. Contact your CAC rep with your ideas, comm; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00070.html (12,121 bytes)
9. Chuck E. Cheese (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob); Date: Mon Mar 8 17:04:16 1993; I combined the two for the November SS CW... This hits it right on the head.... SS is a good model of what the 24-hr category can look like, stretched over 48, not 30 hours. Not for everyone certain; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00092.html (6,395 bytes)
10. 10KW? (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob); Date: Tue Mar 9 17:18:46 1993; 10KW? I really doubt it. With the exception of special efforts like IARU "RadioSport" drill that was run in the Pacific Northwest a few seasons ago, none of our contests can be run on a "level playin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00116.html (7,585 bytes)
11. ARRL SSB (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob); Date: Wed Mar 10 09:51:52 1993; You said > Stop crying about 48 vs 24 hours in these contests. The rules are fine is your - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00130.html (7,818 bytes)
12. ARRL DX SSB - K5NA Multi/2 (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob); Date: Wed Mar 10 10:11:13 1993; Absolutely right on track...... We do something similar here with our club station, but on a smaller scale. A couple of "experienced" ops will take turns keeping the club station open and acting as; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00131.html (7,739 bytes)
13. 10 m Grounwave Contest? Sounds fun! (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob); Date: Wed Mar 10 12:05:06 1993; -- We usually run the contest on the first Saturday (local time) starting at 8:00 PM and running for 4 hours. (So far no cries have been heard for a 2-hour category!) It is sponsored by our club, and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00137.html (7,467 bytes)
14. ARRL SSB (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob K0HB); Date: Wed Mar 10 23:53:52 1993; Thanks for the well reasoned reply Dave. I agree that incentives may well be part of the answer, as witness the apparent upsurge in SS with Pins and Mugs. My own personal opinion still favors a 24-ho; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00153.html (7,489 bytes)
15. Rovers (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob); Date: Fri Mar 12 15:19:03 1993; The CAC mail these days includes a fair amount of queries about some perceived abuse of the Rover category in VHF/UHF contests. Since I get a nose bleed above 30Mhz, I'd like any comments any of you; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00180.html (7,077 bytes)
16. Rovers (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob K0HB); Date: Sat Mar 13 00:25:32 1993; One suggestion has been to limit the percentage of "same station" contacts. Yes, you want to work your buddies, but since the intent of rovers is to afford more grids to EVERYONE, this seems outside; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00186.html (6,673 bytes)
17. Rovers (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob K0HB); Date: Sat Mar 13 00:27:24 1993; -- Forwarded Message -- RE: Rovers that is outside the intent of the rover catagory as i had thought of it. i am not sure what can be done to avoid that from happening. tell them to stop? i would lik; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00187.html (6,439 bytes)
18. Rovers (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob K0HB); Date: Sat Mar 13 01:28:49 1993; Bumper-tag rovers, 4-corner grid dancing, drive-up QSO's, etc..... As CAC rep, since the January VHF contest I have seen a mini-tornado of correspondence regarding the rover category. Specifically th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00188.html (8,069 bytes)
19. Florida Antenna/Transmitting Restrictions (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob); Date: Tue Mar 16 13:29:09 1993; Gee, I thought most of here were the ARRL! The HQ staff is the hired hands, they are not the ARRL. Personally, I don't think HQ **should** impose a veiwpoint here on the reflector, but rather use th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00207.html (7,018 bytes)
20. Poor Billy (score: 1): Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob); Date: Fri Mar 19 09:48:51 1993; If this "24 hour" idea ever gets to a vote, it will go like this: "NAY" - Those who have made the "top ten box", or think they will next year. "AYE" - Everyone else.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00241.html (6,054 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]