Mail Archive Search: <+from:@worldnet.att.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:@worldnet.att.net: 414 ]

Total 414 documents matching your query.

181. [CQ-Contest] Plano TX Towers - long (score: 1): Author: n5nj@worldnet.att.net (Robert Naumann); Date: Wed Nov 11 13:24:20 1998; The following article appeared in the "Plano Star Courier" on November 5 written by Eric Sipos. I have received permission from the Editor to publish this here. Perhaps, with equal effort and reasona; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00151.html (12,312 bytes)
182. [CQ-Contest] Diversity Reception (score: 1): Author: w9re@worldnet.att.net (Mike Wetzel); Date: Fri Nov 13 00:30:09 1998; A little late on this note but All this talk about diversity reception made me think of a fact that I discovered by accident that may not be well known. If you have 2 Icom transceivers that have a re; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00189.html (7,010 bytes)
183. [CQ-Contest] CW speed - send vs. copy (score: 1): Author: n5nj@worldnet.att.net (Robert Naumann); Date: Wed Nov 18 13:07:29 1998; OK enough heard from the "foreigners". In a DX contest, what Bruce says is generally true. If the guy can't listen to 3 or 4 rapid qsos and figure out what he's going to get, forget it ! Just sending; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00264.html (8,576 bytes)
184. [CQ-Contest] QSO B4... NO YOU DIDN'T! (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Thu Dec 10 13:49:17 1998; Of course, the answer to the problem is NEVER to delete a duplicate QSO. Just leave it in as a duplicate for zero credit. 73, John, K4BAI/8P9HT. -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00048.html (7,573 bytes)
185. [CQ-Contest] dupes (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Thu Dec 10 15:30:10 1998; Here is my dupe experience at 8P9Z this year CQWWCW. 6560 non dupe QSOs, 162 dupes. Call signed every QSO (almost). Every QSOs except tail enders like ZW5B mentioned in his write up and a few USA pil; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00052.html (6,982 bytes)
186. [CQ-CONTEST] RE:CW notes from K1KI M/M (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Sat Feb 22 12:40:15 1997; BY4A via N4BO ;-) de Doug KR2Q [yeah, yeah...I know...now has new callsign] -- CQ Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-02/msg00095.html (6,420 bytes)
187. [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?) (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Thu Mar 6 01:44:03 1997; So..... The BIG question is: 1) DID YOU CHANGE THAT CALL IN YOUR LOG TO TM1C, 2) LEAVE IT AS IS (T1MC)? 3) DELETED THE QSO COMPLETED 4) LEFT IT IN, COUNTED IT AS ZERO POINTS. 5) OTHER? de Doug KR2Q@w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00081.html (7,182 bytes)
188. [CQ-Contest] Control Op in Contest? (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Fri Mar 7 00:35:48 1997; Gee... This is NOT my understanding of this statement. I have always taken this "exception" to mean that if (for example) KR2Q chats with P5AA, KR2Q IS permitted to ask that a message from KR2Q (or w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00094.html (8,129 bytes)
189. [CQ-Contest] 830s...tks! (score: 1): Author: n5nj@worldnet.att.net (Robert Naumann); Date: Wed Mar 12 12:18:12 1997; Both of your concerns regarding beverage hookups and the transverter connection are easily handled via the "Transverter Jack" on the back panel of the 830. Check the schematic in the manual and you'l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00149.html (8,454 bytes)
190. [CQ-Contest] 830s...tks\! (score: 1): Author: n5nj@worldnet.att.net (Robert Naumann); Date: Wed Mar 12 22:42:41 1997; To all those technical purists who have pointed out my incorrect statement, let me re-phase it. ;-) "In contest operation, the TS830's extremely low level of phase noise causes negligible negative im; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00164.html (6,390 bytes)
191. [CQ-Contest] Kenwood TS-830S (score: 1): Author: nn9k@worldnet.att.net (Peter Beedlow); Date: Fri Mar 14 12:12:56 1997; With all the good things being said about the 830's maybe I shouldn't do this. But if you're interested in a Kenwood TS-830S with cascaded 400Hz International Radio filters and external digital VFO (; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00190.html (6,604 bytes)
192. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX points system (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Tue Mar 25 17:38:22 1997; I have carefully thought about it, and I've decided to agree that the point system sucks. But rather than make the points for same country QSO's count more, I think they should count less! That way,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00356.html (7,248 bytes)
193. [CQ-Contest] PLEASE WORK ME! (score: 1): Author: kenkeeler@worldnet.att.net (Ken Keeler); Date: Wed Mar 26 23:41:28 1997; Hi Tim: Sorry I can't work you this year is Pd'A. In an effort to win in some category, I'm going 160m/ RTTY/QRP/over 60. I know your 160 rig can't run QRP. But <bold>please work me</bold>/us in the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00388.html (8,186 bytes)
194. [CQ-Contest] pick up the gaunlet! (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Fri Apr 4 13:25:27 1997; Okay you "hate the zero point, hate the 36 hour format, hate the wrong weekend" WPX types. Here is a GENUINE challenge. Perhap Mr. contesting.com can help out (not sure which call Bill is using now ?; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00048.html (7,739 bytes)
195. [CQ-Contest] Zero points... (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Mon Apr 7 17:07:44 1997; Being a KR2 is a double-edged sword in the WPX. Yes, a KR2 is more attractive to those NN6 and KK5 boys/gals, but it is also more attractive to HUNDREDS of N6 and K5 types also. I NEVER refuse to ans; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00081.html (8,268 bytes)
196. [CQ-Contest] hello WPX'ers (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Tue Apr 8 14:00:56 1997; Hi there.... Recently I made a post about the ratio of USA QSO:USA MULT for USA WPXers. Several of you have already sent me actual data, but I would like to receive much more. Please review the TOTAL; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00102.html (7,232 bytes)
197. [CQ-Contest] JIDX (score: 1): Author: N6NT@worldnet.att.net (Bruce Sawyer); Date: Mon Apr 14 06:46:52 1997; At least a few people besides me saw Tack's (JE1CKA) posting the other day and decided to take him up on the JIDX challenge. Going into it, this had all the appearance of a gentleman's weekend contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00163.html (9,056 bytes)
198. [CQ-Contest] 3*8 hour contests - NO (score: 1): Author: N6NT@worldnet.att.net (Bruce Sawyer); Date: Wed Apr 2 19:43:42 1997; This is easy to say when you have a TF3 prefix, but absolutely not true when you are a N6 (or W6 or K6, ...) I believe it is more exciting to watch paint dry or grass grow than it is to operate a DX; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00179.html (8,428 bytes)
199. [CQ-Contest] Reminder about THE DAILY DX (score: 1): Author: N6NT@worldnet.att.net (Bruce Sawyer); Date: Wed Apr 30 15:40:18 1997; This sure looks to me like an advertisement--a commercial message here on the contest reflector. This is the same thing that happens to me every evening when I try to have a peaceful dinner with my w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00307.html (7,916 bytes)
200. [CQ-Contest] YURI-nation (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Thu May 1 15:01:45 1997; Yuri... You just don't seem to be getting the idea, so here it is in black and white. You have burned a lot of bridges behind you and there are (apparently) lots of folks still upset about it. Certai; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00003.html (7,848 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]