Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:@worldnet.att.net: 414 ]

Total 414 documents matching your query.

141. [CQ-Contest] cqww log checking (score: 1)
Author: alan.kaul@worldnet.att.net (Alan Kaul W6RCL)
Date: Sun Mar 15 00:21:11 1998
What a great service this is -- to make the info available to those who use electronic logging. And a reminder to those whom you work and don't put you in the log -- they might have been anonymous in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00273.html (7,924 bytes)

142. [CQ-Contest] Re: Public reporting of UBN data (score: 1)
Author: alan.kaul@worldnet.att.net (Alan Kaul)
Date: Mon Mar 16 11:46:58 1998
I believe that at the very least, contest sponsors should consider publishing both the entrant's ''claimed score'' and the "final score." To publish one without the other is to omit a frame of refer
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00298.html (8,237 bytes)

143. [CQ-Contest] cqww log checking (score: 1)
Author: alan.kaul@worldnet.att.net (Alan Kaul)
Date: Tue Mar 17 18:17:43 1998
Alan Kaul, W6RCL, LaCanada, CA w6rcl@amsat.org http://home.att.net/~alan.kaul/qrp.html -- I'm confused about that -- if your call is N6VH and the other station logs you as N6VA and the log-checkers h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00327.html (8,420 bytes)

144. [CQ-Contest] K7FR UBN thoughts (score: 1)
Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Wed Mar 18 09:25:27 1998
Good for you, Gary. I hope others will list those stateside stations that caused them to lose mults so that a pattern will emerge. I would think the station managers of those stations would try to se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00338.html (7,979 bytes)

145. [CQ-Contest] Apparent UBN MISTAKE - "NIL QSO" is in the log! (score: 1)
Author: alan.kaul@worldnet.att.net (Alan Kaul W6RCL)
Date: Wed Mar 18 22:30:45 1998
Read this problem as outlined by Don... listed for them --snip-- -- HERE'S THE LAST FEW QSO'S FROM W6RCL 15M CQWW SSB LOG, 1997, 26-Oct-97 2348 136 21.438 JF1SEK 59 25 3 26-Oct-97 2348 137 21.435 JO1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00356.html (9,280 bytes)

146. [CQ-Contest] Re: UBN solutions USA/USA QSO's (score: 1)
Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Thu Mar 19 09:08:42 1998
Hello Jav: If you are talking about the station who called the one running, the usual reason is that he didn't figure out who he was calling until after the QSO was over. He thought he was calling a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00360.html (7,736 bytes)

147. [CQ-Contest] Contesting, exchanges/frequency (score: 1)
Author: n5nj@worldnet.att.net (Robert Naumann)
Date: Sun Mar 22 12:34:42 1998
Stu is correct that sharing this sort of information is valuable. I believe, however, that the "gentleman's agreement" always was to do an Announcement of these occurrences rather than a DX Spot. Of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00404.html (10,027 bytes)

148. [CQ-Contest] CQ-WPX..A Modest Proposal (score: 1)
Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Fri Apr 3 09:24:39 1998
Hi Barry: Because there are still plenty of guys who will call you for a contact in the WPX contest when you are in the Caribbean (for instance) who will not call for the KQ2 mult. You have a much be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00045.html (9,206 bytes)

149. [CQ-Contest] Who makes the decisions? (score: 1)
Author: KU8E@worldnet.att.net (Jeffrey Clarke)
Date: Fri Apr 3 12:48:01 1998
-- From what I understand (from people I know that have served on the CAC) the CAC does not make rule changes for ARRL sponsored contests. They are only an advisory board. The board of directors make
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00050.html (7,941 bytes)

150. [CQ-Contest] Palmyra (score: 1)
Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Wed Apr 15 12:33:44 1998
KP6AL is the correct call. 73, John, K4BAI. -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00241.html (8,083 bytes)

151. [CQ-Contest] Contest/DX Pedition Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: nd3a@worldnet.att.net (Rob Shapiro - ND3A)
Date: Thu Apr 16 18:24:39 1998
I have seen various discussions in the past concerning power supplies, antennas and transceivers suitable for contest/dx peditions, but don't remember seeing any concerning HF amplifiers. I wonder wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00261.html (7,034 bytes)

152. [CQ-Contest] Fw: DX & Contesting Forums Outrage (score: 1)
Author: KU8E@worldnet.att.net (Jeffrey Clarke)
Date: Sat Apr 18 11:07:38 1998
I think the Hamvention has made the wrong call in moving the Contest and DX forums. I like to pop in and out the forum, like many others do. I really can feel for the guys that hold forums that are n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00306.html (12,428 bytes)

153. [CQ-Contest] Contest/DX Pedition Amplifiers - Survey Results (score: 1)
Author: nd3a@worldnet.att.net (Rob Shapiro - ND3A)
Date: Tue Apr 28 21:23:12 1998
A week and a half ago, I sent out a query as to what amplifiers people prefer to travel with. I received many responses, which I will paraphrase below: KA9FOX: Dentron Clipperton L seems to fit under
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00368.html (10,033 bytes)

154. [CQ-Contest] ATTN: SP Contesters (score: 1)
Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Thu Apr 30 22:53:49 1998
My paper log for this year's SPDX Contest has been returned by the post office marked "retour nexiste plus" from the address published in CQ Magazine and on the LA9HW web page. This is: SPDX Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00397.html (6,089 bytes)

155. [CQ-Contest] Need Licensing Info on SV (score: 1)
Author: N6NT@worldnet.att.net (Bruce Sawyer)
Date: Tue May 19 15:42:18 1998
Does anybody here have any reliable, recent information on licensing in Greece? The stuff on the ARRL page is both ancient and essentially useless. I'm thinking very seriously at taking off to do the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-05/msg00175.html (6,637 bytes)

156. [CQ-Contest] post contest log modifications (score: 1)
Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Thu Jul 2 16:08:52 1998
One thing I feel strongly about is the second of Bill's situations posted today: getting your club or group together and comparing logs and calls, making corrections and then sending the entry in. Ov
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00021.html (10,685 bytes)

157. [CQ-Contest] checking of scores-ss cw (score: 1)
Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Thu Jul 2 17:50:42 1998
With regard to the recent message from NA2N, it seems to me that every contest sponsor should have a firm rule: If log checking reduces an apparent winner's claimed score below that of another entran
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00025.html (7,055 bytes)

158. [CQ-Contest] Re: When is the compeition over? (score: 1)
Author: n8mk.n8ixt@worldnet.att.net (Mike or Judy Kwiatkowski)
Date: Thu Jul 2 01:09:34 1998
In a PGA event, it ain't over until the score card is signed - after the player has reviewed it to make sure the score for each hole is correct. In league bowling, the score sheet may be corrected be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00057.html (7,941 bytes)

159. [CQ-Contest] San Antontio (score: 1)
Author: k4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Tue Jul 21 04:14:50 1998
Hello San Antonio: If anyone in the San Antonio area is interesting in meeting to talks contests and DX, I will be in town through Thursday night. I will check e-mail each evening. Messages can be le
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00179.html (6,592 bytes)

160. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1)
Author: k4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Wed Jul 22 23:11:31 1998
As the unnamed partner of W4AN at WRTC, I agree with Bill that we signed our call always and that is the best thing to do most of the time. Dick probably is right also, that there may be very limited
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00187.html (11,024 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu