Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+Speed\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+Speed\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Antennaware] Speed (score: 1): Author: Alexandru <alexander@sandlabs.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:40:07 -0500; I have this nagging question that begs to be answered :) If the Radio Waves are traveling at, say 66% of c, in my feeder how come they are accelerating to about c once they leaving the antennae ? Whe; /archives//html/Antennaware/2005-11/msg00005.html (6,358 bytes)
2. Re: [Antennaware] Speed (score: 1): Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:33:38 -0500; Without perhaps explaining underlying principles in quantum mechanics, the same thing happens with sound waves and light waves, and tsunami waves, for that matter. You may be attempting to equate rad; /archives//html/Antennaware/2005-11/msg00006.html (9,134 bytes)
3. Re: [Antennaware] Speed (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:35:44 -0500; It's not added energy ... it's the absence of drag once the RF hits the antenna. Consider if you were running through a pool of water chest deep .... you would be able to run at maybe 25% of your spe; /archives//html/Antennaware/2005-11/msg00007.html (8,063 bytes)
4. Re: [Antennaware] Speed (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:33:50 -0500; It's not added energy ... it's the absence of drag once the RF hits the antenna. Consider if you were running through a pool of water chest deep .... you would be able to run at maybe 25% of your spe; /archives//html/Antennaware/2005-11/msg00008.html (8,168 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]