Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+Simulating\s+the\s+W6NL\s+40M\s+moxon\s+variant\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Antennaware] Simulating the W6NL 40M moxon variant (score: 1)
Author: "knormoyle@surfnetusa.com" <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:51:59 -0800
My problem: I'm working on a simulation for a M2 40M2L (shorty-forty, linear loading) conversion to a moxon. I'm using the W6NL 40M moxon-like design as a benchmark for SWR bw, and gain/fb. (trying t
/archives//html/Antennaware/2010-02/msg00009.html (9,241 bytes)

2. Re: [Antennaware] Simulating the W6NL 40M moxon variant (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:01:56 -0500 (EST)
Hi Kevin, You are on the right track with this ... and please give this link a close review and note their findings as to F/B, F/S and SWR with the W6NL Moxon design: http://www.kkn.net/dayton2008/Re
/archives//html/Antennaware/2010-02/msg00011.html (11,556 bytes)

3. Re: [Antennaware] Simulating the W6NL 40M moxon variant (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 07:04:52 +0100
Years ago I also did model this and did tha same findings, i e it seems low in frequency. I remember speaking with someone about it, actually I think it was W6NL himself, he claimed it was "dead on".
/archives//html/Antennaware/2010-02/msg00012.html (11,697 bytes)

4. Re: [Antennaware] Simulating the W6NL 40M moxon variant (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:10:02 -0800
Thanks a bunch for that link Bill, I hadn't seen that report. Very nice. yeah, I'm using 4nec2x. I'm new to modeling but have climbed the curve in the last couple months. I've sim'ed a bunch of anten
/archives//html/Antennaware/2010-03/msg00001.html (15,163 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu