Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n6ry@arrl.net: 63 ]

Total 63 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [Antennaware] HF Colinear Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:55:42 -0700
Karin, Its hard to beat horizontal antennas on 20m and up due to the ground reflection gain. Same for 40m if you can get a decent height (> .5 wl). As for matching the switched 2-element collinear, a
/archives//html/Antennaware/2019-08/msg00008.html (10,649 bytes)

62. Re: [Antennaware] HF Colinear Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:54:01 -0700
Hi Karin, I looked at your model, and it looks pretty good. One change I would make would be to use the more accurate Real/High Accuracy ground type instead of Real/MININEC ground. The gain and imped
/archives//html/Antennaware/2019-08/msg00013.html (15,930 bytes)

63. Re: [Antennaware] HF Colinear Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:41:22 -0700
I've attached copies of the AutoEZ.weq files for the 2 element col(l)inear antenna with Karin's parameters. I added the 2.8 foot lengths of RG-400 in the baluns (great attention to detail, Karin). Th
/archives//html/Antennaware/2019-08/msg00015.html (20,075 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu