Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n6ry@arrl.net: 63 ]

Total 63 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Antennaware] EZNEC Model For a 6 Meter Halo (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:32:17 -0700
I sent Walt an EZNEC model of a circular halo for 6m with a hairpin match. If anyone else is interested, respond off list. 73, Terry N6RY _______________________________________________ Antennaware m
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-03/msg00011.html (6,919 bytes)

42. Re: [Antennaware] helically wound dipole (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:02:50 -0700
The approach of using a pair of helically wound monopoles to create a balanced dipole should work fine. Of course, when you shrink a 66 foot long dipole for 40m down to 8 feet long, you are definitel
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-06/msg00001.html (10,818 bytes)

43. Re: [Antennaware] 4 sq. AZ and EL gain (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:43:06 -0700
Is it possible you are looking at the elevation pattern at 45 degrees off of boresight? Say at 0 or 90 degrees azimuth? The models that come with EZNEC at oriented with line of the elements parallel
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-07/msg00001.html (7,911 bytes)

44. Re: [Antennaware] Pennant (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 20:28:26 -0700
This is easy to model in EZNEC. I used the original 29x14 foot dimensions from K6SE's article in the July 2000 QST with two point-fed pennants with their points separated by 1 foot. The pattern and g
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-07/msg00010.html (9,743 bytes)

45. Re: [Antennaware] Help! Which One ? (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:37:37 -0700
Of course, SteppIR also has a loading coil that gives you coverage across all of 80m and 60m with the BigIR vertical. The efficiency might suffer a little (maybe 1-3 dB) compared to the higher bands
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00013.html (9,665 bytes)

46. Re: [Antennaware] Small Tribander or SteppIR 2-element? (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:44:11 -0700
I created a model of a 2-el yagi on 20m with 6' spacing and the gain in free space is 6.71 dBi (4.56 dBd). F/B is 17 dB. This is with the parasitic element tuned as a director. The feed Z is 22 ohms,
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00026.html (9,588 bytes)

47. Re: [Antennaware] feedline modeling (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:26:15 -0700
Paul, It's usually much easier and often more accurate to use the built-in transmission line capability in EZNEC for modeling feed lines. The exception is for cases, such as stubs in collinears or St
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00037.html (8,702 bytes)

48. Re: [Antennaware] SuperLoop 80 (was Help! Which One) (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:41:38 -0700
It's no problem modeling the stub in EZNEC using the built-in "virtual" transmission line feature. From the Radioworks description, it appears that it's a shorted 1/4 wl stub on 40m, which looks like
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00038.html (9,530 bytes)

49. Re: [Antennaware] Height for horizontal loops (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:01:06 -0700
Thanks for the modeling data, Paul. Not surprisingly, the horizontal loop (1 wl circumference) has to be higher than a dipole to give equal or greater gain at angles 50 degrees or less (since the loo
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00049.html (11,099 bytes)

50. Re: [Antennaware] plot comparisons - addition (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:36:25 -0800
When I overlay the elevation plot for a 4 square array on top of the plot of single vertical, the plot for the single vertical is ~5 dB down from the 4 sq. I tried setting the reference gain for the
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-11/msg00007.html (8,888 bytes)

51. Re: [Antennaware] plot comparisons (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:41:17 -0800
I tried Gary's approach of using an external graphic program with the simple "Paint" program that is included in Win XP. From the 2D plot window in EZNEC, I used Edit - Copy Plot, then pasted the plo
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-11/msg00010.html (10,880 bytes)

52. Re: [Antennaware] 3 element sideways vees - coax lengths? (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:06:04 -0800
The demo version of EZNEC, with its limit of 20 segments, won't be too accurate for this array. At a minimum, you should use 10 segments per half-wavelength, so a 3-element array needs 30 segments ju
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-11/msg00017.html (11,150 bytes)

53. Re: [Antennaware] center loading versus ground loading (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:31:15 -0800
The unloaded Q of the inductor should have a very minor effect on the bandwidth and efficiency of WX7G's 67 foot antenna on 160m. The series resistance of a 70uH coil with Q=400 is only about 2 ohms.
/archives//html/Antennaware/2010-02/msg00000.html (16,564 bytes)

54. Re: [Antennaware] Negative Impedance Converter NIC (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:15:00 -0700
Andrew, It seems like you could put a resistor of the design "-R" value in series with the input of the NIC and check for a short circuit. If you're thinking of using this to cancel the resistive loa
/archives//html/Antennaware/2010-09/msg00009.html (8,662 bytes)

55. Re: [Antennaware] Dipole-balun question (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 07:46:44 -0700
John, Probably the best approach is a 4:1 "current" balun, which tends to float the connection to the twinlead and should reduce current on the outside of the shield of the 75 ohm coax. However, in t
/archives//html/Antennaware/2013-06/msg00002.html (9,581 bytes)

56. Re: [Antennaware] Help with Short Dipole (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 12:18:24 -0700
Gedas, I think youve gotten some great advice on this antenna, but I think this is better as a thought experiment than a real antenna. Ive attached my EZNEC model for your consideration (which will p
/archives//html/Antennaware/2019-03/msg00025.html (14,226 bytes)

57. Re: [Antennaware] Very Low Dipole Radiation Resistance (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 18:40:23 -0700
I suspect youll be just as close by trusting the model. Making measurements of antennas in the wild, especially one with so many lossy elements, is likely to involve a lot of approximations, too. Cur
/archives//html/Antennaware/2019-03/msg00036.html (10,820 bytes)

58. Re: [Antennaware] EZNEC how to choose number of segments (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 10:03:17 -0700
Dave, In general, using real/Mininec ground will give you slightly optimistic gain numbers, especially with horizontal conductors under 1/4 wavelength above ground. This is because for impedance calc
/archives//html/Antennaware/2019-07/msg00010.html (11,168 bytes)

59. [Antennaware] Fwd: HF Colinear Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:53:14 -0700
_______________________________________________ Antennaware mailing list Antennaware@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/antennaware
/archives//html/Antennaware/2019-08/msg00003.html (10,154 bytes)

60. Re: [Antennaware] Fwd: HF Colinear Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:54:27 -0700
Hi Greg, No secrets here! Have you considered a double extended Zepp? If you dont need an out of phase pattern with a broadside null, its essentially the same gain as a collinear. Of course, since th
/archives//html/Antennaware/2019-08/msg00004.html (14,398 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu