Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n6ry@arrl.net: 63 ]

Total 63 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Antennaware] Phased Verticals - Simpfeed (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:30:18 -0700
Brad, I had a little more time to look at this, and if your individual elements are indeed close to 50 ohms with the other element open circuit, the W7EL Simpfeed system could work quite well. I plug
/archives//html/Antennaware/2007-09/msg00011.html (10,007 bytes)

22. [Antennaware] Simpfeed program (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:22:13 -0700
I had a couple of requests for the location of Simpfeed.exe. There is a link to it in the fourth item at http://www.eznec.com/Amateur/Articles/index.html The program comes in a self-extracting .zip f
/archives//html/Antennaware/2007-09/msg00012.html (8,361 bytes)

23. Re: [Antennaware] Grid Dipping coax (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:01:27 -0700
Either the shorted half-wave or open quarter-wave is OK. Normal practice is to use a small coil connected to the coax between center conductor and shield, with one or two turns that is just big enoug
/archives//html/Antennaware/2007-10/msg00015.html (7,714 bytes)

24. Re: [Antennaware] dBi conversion to Antenna Factor (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:57:02 -0800
I'm not sure that's what Guy was implying. I don't think that there isn't any particular impedance assumed by EZNEC, but it does normally assume that all the power from the source is delivered to the
/archives//html/Antennaware/2007-11/msg00005.html (10,062 bytes)

25. Re: [Antennaware] 20m rotatable dipole configuration? (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 10:17:36 -0800
Although there are no absolutes when it comes to antennas, if you have a rotatable configuration, the straight dipole would be much better, since it will have nice nulls off the ends and slightly mor
/archives//html/Antennaware/2007-12/msg00006.html (7,465 bytes)

26. Re: [Antennaware] Random wire on 160 (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:37:40 -0800
That length isn't too random, since it's a quarter-wavelength on 160m, so depending on how you route it, you could think of it as an inverted-L. Your success will depend on how high you can get most
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-01/msg00002.html (8,351 bytes)

27. Re: [Antennaware] Short Term Fix - - Verticals (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 12:27:04 -0800
Warren, It sounds like you probably are intending to use 1/4 wl spacing on 40m, which means 3/4 wl on 15m. This is a little wide, but still useable. Once you go past 5/8 wl spacing, the sidelobes sta
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-03/msg00005.html (8,858 bytes)

28. Re: [Antennaware] building a TAK-Tenna ??? (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:06:34 -0700
There has been some discussion about the Tak-tennas on the TowerTalk list. Start at http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00319.html The comments from K4SAV are especially p
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-04/msg00021.html (8,686 bytes)

29. Re: [Antennaware] Antenna wire in EZNEC (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 12:16:37 -0700
Andrew sent me a copy of his model, which is a non-terminated triangular loop, apex up, fed in the center of the bottom wire, which is 1 meter high. It does appear that the resistance of the wire is
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-05/msg00006.html (9,518 bytes)

30. Re: [Antennaware] 4 Sq, verses 3 El endfire (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:38:44 -0700
Andy, You can use the same delay lines and phase angles with the 4 Square, but you have to make the length of the diagonal equal to the 80m spacing between elements 1 and 3 in the linear endfire arra
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-09/msg00008.html (10,424 bytes)

31. Re: [Antennaware] 160 meter 3/8 wire, steel or copper (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:11:17 -0700
Flam, I modeled this with EZNEC (without the tower) and assumed the 1.5 mm diameter stainless steel wire has a resistivity of 7.2 e-7 ohm-m and relative permeability of 1.02. I estimated about 20 ohm
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-09/msg00011.html (8,704 bytes)

32. Re: [Antennaware] 160 meter 3/8 wire, steel or copper (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:13:35 -0700
Using 2.5 mm vs. 1.5 mm diameter copper only increases the gain by about 0.1 dB. The feedpoint R is about 1 ohm lower, and the bandwidth increases by about 4 kHz. The resonance moves up by 13 kHz to
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-09/msg00013.html (10,627 bytes)

33. Re: [Antennaware] 160 meter 3/8 wire, steel or copper (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:24:11 -0700
Yes, Flam's 46.5m wire is only about 0.29 wl. However, making it longer would raise the feedpoint Z even higher. There might be a slight improvement in efficiency, but usually most of the extra signa
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-09/msg00018.html (8,614 bytes)

34. Re: [Antennaware] 2-element delta loop array close to ground (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:16:31 -0800
I tried this in EZNEC and get the same sort of results. With a ~5% smaller director, the F/B is about 3 dB with 12 foot spacing. Decreasing the director spacing improves the F/B very slightly: with 7
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-11/msg00006.html (8,232 bytes)

35. Re: [Antennaware] MFJ-259B question (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:19:32 -0800
Perhaps others can confirm this, but I think the "cable loss mode" requires that the far end be either opened or shorted (to give an infinite SWR or Return Loss = 0 dB at the load), and NOT connected
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-12/msg00008.html (9,265 bytes)

36. Re: [Antennaware] EZNEC model versus reality (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:32:10 -0800
Doesn't it seem strange that your antenna never actually resonates (X=0)? For a simple quarter wave vertical, you'd expect that if you went high or low enough in frequency, the reactance would go thr
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00007.html (9,799 bytes)

37. Re: [Antennaware] Modeling Software - (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:01:14 -0800
To me, one of the most frustrating limitations of NEC2-based modeling software is its inability to accurately deal with models where conductors of different diameters are joined, especially at right
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00044.html (9,222 bytes)

38. Re: [Antennaware] Equivalency. (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:42:40 -0800
The consideration of orientation may be a concern where the diameter of the cylinder or the face of the tower approaches a half-wavelength. It's unlikely to have any impact on the MF or HF bands for
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00059.html (7,928 bytes)

39. Re: [Antennaware] Voltages along an antenna (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:06:31 -0700
Just place a 10 megohm or larger resistor where you are planning to put the trap or relay. Use the Load Dat function in EZNEC to see the voltage across the load. You can also easily model a trap in E
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-03/msg00007.html (8,890 bytes)

40. Re: [Antennaware] EZnec - coils, traps, baluns, coax, laddreline ? (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:27:16 -0700
I sent Jim two EZNEC models that demonstrate his questions. If anyone else is interested, respond off list. - 73, Terry N6RY _______________________________________________ Antennaware mailing list A
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-03/msg00010.html (8,965 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu