Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Patrick.Wintheiser@PSS.Boeing.com: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [antennaware] Minninec & Nec2 differences (score: 1)
Author: Patrick.Wintheiser@PSS.Boeing.com (Wintheiser, Patrick)
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 16:22:26 -0800
I'm curious about the differences in reports from Minninec and Nec2. Using AO and NW form K6STI, AO reports peak gain for azimuth and elevation. Plots also show current on the wires. NW does not give
/archives//html/Antennaware/1998-12/msg00017.html (7,697 bytes)

2. [antennaware] Q: Extended Double Zepp with tuner and open wire feeders (score: 1)
Author: Patrick.Wintheiser@PSS.Boeing.com (Wintheiser, Patrick)
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 13:33:22 -0800
I have a question for all you antenna gurus' out there. The extended double zepp dipole has its max gain at a non-resonant frequency(about 1 1/4 wavelengths instead of natural resonance at 1 1/2 wave
/archives//html/Antennaware/1998-11/msg00000.html (8,611 bytes)

3. [antennaware] Q: Extended Double Zepp with tuner and open wire feeders (score: 1)
Author: Patrick.Wintheiser@PSS.Boeing.com (Wintheiser, Patrick)
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 09:32:38 -0800
Ok, thanks everyone for the great responses. My confusion lies with the 'apparent' lengthening of the antenna by using ladder line. I put up up an 80 meter dipole last summer with about 60' of ladder
/archives//html/Antennaware/1998-11/msg00002.html (9,011 bytes)

4. [antennaware] Q: Extended Double Zepp with tuner and open wire feeders (score: 1)
Author: Patrick.Wintheiser@PSS.Boeing.com (Wintheiser, Patrick)
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 07:58:05 -0800
Thanks LB for continuing to educate me. By the way, I just love your '12 ways to love your feeders' on your Web page. I have studied that very closely. I spent a few hours in the antenna handbook las
/archives//html/Antennaware/1998-11/msg00004.html (9,093 bytes)

5. [antennaware] Q: Extended Double Zepp with tuner and open wire feeders (score: 1)
Author: Patrick.Wintheiser@PSS.Boeing.com (Wintheiser, Patrick)
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 16:35:56 -0800
Thanks to all who so kindly found time to reply to my dumb questions. I wish the answer was obvious to me but it ain't exactly so. I do understand what's happening with the extended zepp now. As to t
/archives//html/Antennaware/1998-11/msg00013.html (9,622 bytes)

6. [antennaware] Homebrew vertical construction (score: 1)
Author: Patrick.Wintheiser@PSS.Boeing.com (Wintheiser, Patrick)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 09:55:39 -0700
My first attempt at replying to antennaware. I've modeled elevated radials in a 'bowtie' shape and tested. Length of radials is about 172/f . The 'bowtie' is just as you imagine. String 2 sets of ele
/archives//html/Antennaware/1998-09/msg00014.html (8,014 bytes)

7. [antennaware] Homebrew vertical construction (score: 1)
Author: Patrick.Wintheiser@PSS.Boeing.com (Wintheiser, Patrick)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 15:44:15 -0700
Interesting Gary. I'm not sure what shape your bent radials are. The Bowtie shape I described is actually a variation off something from LB. The radial length is in between 1/8 and 1/4 wave, about 3/
/archives//html/Antennaware/1998-09/msg00017.html (8,005 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu