Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*R\:\s+\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+swr\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*R\:\s+\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+swr\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. R: [AMPS] Re: swr (score: 1): Author: Maurizio Panicara" <i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara); Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 01:23:40 +0200; This is an opinable statement. If the the center is 1 Ohm, then all the plotted values in the chart have to be normalized to it. When values are normalized, any value can a become a normalized 1 Ohm; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00034.html (9,810 bytes)
2. R: [AMPS] Re: swr (score: 1): Author: w7iuv@axtek.com (Larry Molitor); Date: Sat, 02 Oct 1999 20:29:11 +0100; Mauri, I stated "standard Smith Chart". Of course there exist "custom" prints for those who are either to lazy for or incapable of the normalization process. Actually, like most of the heated discuss; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00052.html (9,536 bytes)
3. R: [AMPS] Re: swr (score: 1): Author: Maurizio Panicara" <i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 23:07:31 +0200; Not considering losses, there are only 2 conditions were no changes in impedance occurs between antenna and transmitter : 1 ) Source, line and load have the same impedance 2 ) The line is half wavele; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00298.html (12,425 bytes)
4. R: [AMPS] Re: swr (score: 1): Author: Maurizio Panicara" <i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara); Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 14:58:02 +0200; John, concerning the point "a", source line and load, I was not talking of SWR changes but of impedance changes between antenna and transmitter, moreover as a direction and not as a versus. The best; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00312.html (9,963 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]