Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+triband\/warc\s+interaction\:\s+G3JVC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+triband\/warc\s+interaction\:\s+G3JVC\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] triband/warc interaction: G3JVC (score: 1): Author: jljarvis@adelphia.net (jljarvis); Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 08:09:28 -0400; G3JVC....what VK6APK, Alek, said is quite right. Placing 'em on the same boom will bring the interactions under control. There will still be some mutual coupling and detuning that takes place, but th; /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00160.html (7,118 bytes)
2. [Amps] triband/warc interaction: G3JVC (score: 1): Author: Peter.Chadwick@zarlink.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 13:27:25 +0100; I run a 20m monobander about 6 or 8 feet below a 4 ele for 10 interlaced witha 4 ele for 15. Don't seem to do too badly - the T24 came back first call on 15 last Saturday morning. Still need KP1 and; /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00162.html (6,655 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]