Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+step\s+start\s+\.\.\s+needed\s+or\s+not\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+step\s+start\s+\.\.\s+needed\s+or\s+not\s+\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] step start .. needed or not ? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:35:08 -0800; We got around to discovering the why; so subsequent commercial transmitters had the step start added. The inrush current varies. depending upon the magnet memory of the core when it was shut off, and; /archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00718.html (9,769 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] step start .. needed or not ? (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:44:48 -0500; First I'm a firm believer in using a ramp up for both plate and filament voltage and particularly in amps. The specs will show that most indirectly heated cathodes do not *need* a step start and from; /archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00731.html (16,601 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]