Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+shorted\s+filter\s+cap\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+shorted\s+filter\s+cap\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] shorted filter cap (score: 1): Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:01:58 -0600; Shorted is relative. If you can measure low enough, there is no such thing as a short. A piece of wire is usually considered a short, but we all know it has some values of resistance. A few ohms comp; /archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00344.html (7,903 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] shorted filter cap (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:28:48 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Correct, in the theoretical sense. In the practical sense, anyone who has been troubleshooting long knows the difference between a shorted part and one that is leaky, and tha; /archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00363.html (7,816 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] shorted filter cap (score: 1): Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:50:09 -0800; Semantics. If it goes 'bang' and causes me to claw the ceiling, then that's close enough to shorted for me, although in the heat of the moment I might choose expletives over adjectives... 73, Jim, N7; /archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00365.html (8,342 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]