Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+repair\s+of\s+older\s+Command\s+Tech\s+VHF\-2000\s+amp\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola <gudguyham@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:17:41 -0400 (EDT)
I performed what seemed to be a rather odd repair on an older Command Tech VHF-2000. I thought I would share this since it could possibly affect the HF models. This particular amp like most has a pie
/archives//html/Amps/2013-10/msg00227.html (8,192 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Bitterlich" <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:44:36 -0400
Louis, This phenonamom used to be seen quite regularly in certain military aircraft where coax types such as RG-214, RG-213, RG-217 were used. Any kind of medium to sharp bend at all, co-located with
/archives//html/Amps/2013-10/msg00229.html (10,138 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:40:58 -0400
Teflon is very prone to cold flow as are some foam cables. Neither should be subjected to sharp bends and the manufacturers specs should be followed. RG-213/214 type dielectrics are much less prone t
/archives//html/Amps/2013-10/msg00232.html (12,023 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp (score: 1)
Author: peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 22:15:30 +0200
Carl, I am not trying to be rude, but surely Neither should be subjected to sharp bends and the manufacturers specs should be followed. RG-213/214 type dielectrics are much less prone to cold flow bu
/archives//html/Amps/2013-10/msg00234.html (8,738 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp (score: 1)
Author: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:21:16 -0500
Do you HAVE to be as old as we are to realise this? It's not that we don't realize, but I have forgotten it several times...... Don W4DNR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing
/archives//html/Amps/2013-10/msg00235.html (7,951 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Bitterlich" <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:46:03 -0400
When subjected to external heat, the best coax to use is a teflon dielectric. Mark wa3jpy -- Original Message -- From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> To: "Mark Bitterlich" <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com
/archives//html/Amps/2013-10/msg00237.html (13,271 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:26:25 -0400
I didnt say it wasnt. Ive no idea what temperatures are encountered in those crammed USAF equipment racks. My 432 amp has a 2700W Pd tube in order to get 1000W as an AM linear; all that heat goes som
/archives//html/Amps/2013-10/msg00239.html (14,806 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:50:11 -0700
What kind of coax? 73 Jim W7RY On 10/14/2013 9:17 AM, Louis Parascondola wrote: I performed what seemed to be a rather odd repair on an older Command Tech VHF-2000. I thought I would share this since
/archives//html/Amps/2013-10/msg00240.html (9,863 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:51:14 -0400
A very astute observation Peter. I dont know the current requirements for various levels of licenses in the UK but over here even a certified retard can pass an Extra as no CW is required and anyone
/archives//html/Amps/2013-10/msg00242.html (10,841 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 21:51:28 -0700
Carl wrote... Easiest in the other order. 73, George T Daughters, K6GT CU in the California QSO Party (CQP) October 5-6, 2013 _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@co
/archives//html/Amps/2013-10/msg00246.html (8,103 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp (score: 1)
Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:50:34 +0000
Carl, I dont know the current requirements for various levels of licenses in the UK but over here even a certified retard can pass an Extra as no CW is required and anyone can be trained to memorize
/archives//html/Amps/2013-10/msg00258.html (10,797 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp (score: 1)
Author: Vic K2VCO <k2vco.vic@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:27:20 -0700
Answers to pure multiple-choice exams are easy to memorize. When I took amateur and commercial exams more than 50 years ago, schematics were required, as well as a number of mathematical computations
/archives//html/Amps/2013-10/msg00263.html (11,902 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp (score: 1)
Author: KA4INM <ka4inm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:43:57 -0400
A very astute observation Peter. I don't know the current requirements for various levels of licenses in the UK but over here even a certified retard can pass an Extra as no CW is required and anyon
/archives//html/Amps/2013-10/msg00288.html (9,942 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu