Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+peers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] peers (score: 1)
Author: Herzog <herzog@frontiernet.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:11:28 -0400
We all this peer group, just unpaided, and only mildly biased. There are enough to cancel out, and hover about the real magical truths. K2LB REPLY: Exactly. Not wanting to state the obvious, but that
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00560.html (6,687 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] peers (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:18:26 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Peer reviews should be done before publication, not after. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00573.html (6,946 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] peers (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:04:24 -0700
Oh dear, oh no... 73, Gary...wa6fgi ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Peer reviews should be done before publication, not after. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing lis
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00578.html (7,610 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] peers (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:25:53 -0700
That is part of the definition of a peer-reviewed publication. That is, the article is reviewed by experts in the field for technical accuracy. Contrary to what the popular and various interest group
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00647.html (8,058 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu