Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+copper\s+vs\s+steel\s+\/SS\s+\/brass\s+conductors\s+in\s+a\s+HF\s+tank\s+circuit\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:06:27 -0700
Ray, Good question. I would like more information on this too. My meager understanding is that copper or silver plated copper strap is preferable for HF tank circuits. I took the liberty of changing
/archives//html/Amps/2011-03/msg00131.html (14,908 bytes)

2. [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:42:48 -0500
steel and s.s. are ferrous metals; they heat up with enough RF current. Too much R. OTOH if you look at conductive properties of silver and copper (undergraduate introductory physics book) they are s
/archives//html/Amps/2011-03/msg00165.html (6,809 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Tonne" <Tonne@Comcast.Net>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:54:32 -0400
I just checked with one of the fellows who has designed his share of high-power HF rigs and he says brass is the way to go. It is usually cadmium-plated to "keep it shiny looking." Apparently there a
/archives//html/Amps/2011-03/msg00167.html (8,266 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:07:22 -0400
I use silver solder to bond copper strap and tubing and then SS hardware just to add mechanical strength and mounting as needed. Silver plating is a complete waste of time and money below UHF unless
/archives//html/Amps/2011-03/msg00168.html (8,937 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:27:54 -0500
This is another one of those things that may vary according to power, duty cycle and tx time. IOW, 1.5 KW RTTY for 10 minutes --> problem. 800 w. SSB for a minute or two maybe not so bad. I like not
/archives//html/Amps/2011-03/msg00170.html (8,081 bytes)

6. [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit (score: 1)
Author: "John Lyles" <jtml@losalamos.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:06:04 -0700
I'm pleased that Rob specified "in a HF tank circuit" for his comment "they are so nearly the same that copper strap is good enough; silver just looks pretty and impresses people." Silver does look p
/archives//html/Amps/2011-03/msg00171.html (9,169 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:10:59 -0400
All stainless steels are ferrous and I would think that they'd thus all be subject to RF heating. The 300 series alloys have, in general, a higher percentage of chromium and nickel and are not magnet
/archives//html/Amps/2011-03/msg00175.html (9,560 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit (score: 1)
Author: "David C. Hallam" <dhallam@knology.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:21:09 -0400
The addition of nickel changes the crystal structure from body center cubic to face centered cubic. That's why the 300 series are nonmagnetic and can not be heat treated. David KW4DH -- I bring reaso
/archives//html/Amps/2011-03/msg00178.html (10,547 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit (score: 1)
Author: "GEORGE WALLNER" <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:47:26 -0400
Although for practical purposes on HF this is mostly true, there is a difference. Copper oxide is an insulator while silver oxide is a conductor. As the copper oxidizes, the skin current encounters i
/archives//html/Amps/2011-03/msg00182.html (9,373 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:33:52 -0400
You should try your tests at higher frequencies, say 10 meters. At 160 meters current penetration is deeper and will probably be deeper than any plating. Even copper clad wire used as antenna wire is
/archives//html/Amps/2011-03/msg00185.html (11,445 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:43:06 -0400
Do not confuse silver oxide with silver sulphate which is the black coating which appears over time and is the source of many intermittent connections. Properly sized and constructed toroids should n
/archives//html/Amps/2011-03/msg00186.html (10,711 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit (score: 1)
Author: "David C. Hallam" <dhallam@knology.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:42:04 -0400
Silver oxide is slightly conductive but not by very much. Depending upon where you live and what fuel you use to heat your house and cook with, the black tarnish on silver is more likely to be silver
/archives//html/Amps/2011-03/msg00187.html (11,275 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] copper vs steel /SS /brass conductors in a HF tank circuit (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:17:40 -0600
This is total BS! Electrical conductivities: Copper ~1.7x10-8 ohm-m Silver ~1.6x10-8 ohm-m Silver Sulfide ~1.8x10-3 ohm-m Silver Oxide ~1x10+9 ohm-m If you wish to call something that has 62,500,000,
/archives//html/Amps/2011-03/msg00194.html (9,847 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu