Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Why\s+preference\s+for\s+3CPX800A7\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Why\s+preference\s+for\s+3CPX800A7\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Why preference for 3CPX800A7? (score: 1): Author: Dave Haupt <emailw8nf@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:36:55 -0800 (PST); The original reason that hams preferred the P version of the tube was the same reason for most of our preferences: price and availability. The tube was used in relatively high quantities in MRI equip; /archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00524.html (7,596 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Why preference for 3CPX800A7? (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:11:21 +0000; There are definite advantages in using the 3CPX at 432MHz, as identified by K1FO: http://home.cshore.com/lunarlink/etubes/800e.html However, most of these factors apply *only* at UHF where gain and e; /archives//html/Amps/2005-12/msg00000.html (7,737 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]