Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Watch\s+out\s+for\s+a\s+scam\s+by\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Watch\s+out\s+for\s+a\s+scam\s+by\.\.\.\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:25:14 -0500; If you have the time and inclination, there is a thriving "hobby" of stringing these scammers along BIG time. Google 419 baiting and you will find a complete "industry." These reverse baiters have be; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00174.html (7,441 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@onetel.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:23:24 +0100; I can't be bothered to look it up, but I know there is one where someone got some real gold from a scammer. The scammer claimed to have gold of X % purity, but the baiter requested a sample so he cou; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00175.html (7,463 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:52:11 -0700; Q. What is the most annoying thing in a post to a group A. Something that is completely off topic and has nothing to do with the groups focus Q. What is the next most annoying thing A. When someone a; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00176.html (8,434 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:14:23 -0600; A: Top posting to a group shows RESPECT to the readers. Q: Why is bottom posting such a bad thing? A: Bottom posting to a group displays disrespect. It demands the reader to scroll through history to; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00179.html (8,417 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:49:08 -0400; Q: Why is top posting such a bad thing? A: Top posting to a group, makes the reader read the posting out of order {bottom then top} to find out what the post is about. (especially annoying if 30 or 6; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00180.html (8,032 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:18:45 -0400; I have already read (and so has everyone else) the post being replied to in previous email. I want the new post to be on top and not have to bother to scroll down and find where the latest post start; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00182.html (10,673 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: "Sam Carpenter" <sam@owenscommunication.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:54:08 -0400; Ditto. It seems like most everybody does top post unless they are ripping someone else's ideas apart line by line and thought by thought. Sam N9UFT I have already read (and so has everyone else) the; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00184.html (11,278 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:55:17 -0400; It is silly to repeat all of post that you are replying to under any procedure top/bottom. It is a "length of a bridge thing." There is no "hunt and seek" if you have "> " turned on 4 quoted passages; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00185.html (8,705 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:03:31 -0400; Often you have no idea as to which post they are replying to unless it is included. If you don't read the entire thread many posts are meaningless. 73 Roger (K8RI) Here we go again. _________________; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00186.html (8,945 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:56:01 -0400; Roger, Your post is a good example of what you are saying. You did not include the last paragraph of my post, which is what you are replying about. This was the last paragraph of my first post: ("Wi; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00188.html (10,005 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:29:45 -0500; _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00189.html (10,059 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:32:44 -0500; _______________________________________________ after a long quote with nothing added my second favorite post is the long quote with only one short sentence of new content buried at the end and hard; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00190.html (14,856 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] Watch out for a scam by... (score: 1): Author: "Jim Tonne" <Tonne@Comcast.Net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:33:44 -0400; I thought this was "Watch out for a scam by ... Does anyone want my great chili recipe ? - Jim W4ENE _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists; /archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00191.html (8,227 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]