Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Vertex

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Vertex_Yaesu\s+Merger\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Vertex_Yaesu Merger (score: 1): Author: Dennis W0JX <w0jx@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 18:15:47 -0800 (PST); If this merger goes through, it will be the end of Yaesu as we know it. I know many hams who work for Motorola in Illinois. Employees are generally demoralized from cut after cut. Just look at Motoro; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00066.html (7,127 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Vertex_Yaesu Merger (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 11:23:55 +0100 (CET); Once upon a time, there was very succesful VHF radio telephone manufacturing company based at 110 Artillerisvej, Copenhagen, called Storno. They had subsidiaries in a lot of other European countries,; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00072.html (7,940 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Vertex_Yaesu Merger (score: 1): Author: "John E. Cleeve" <g3jvc@jcleeve.idps.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 10:42:05 -0000; Hello Peter, Storno was part of the Great Northern Telegraph Company, which does still exist, however it would appear that the "bean counters" have taken over. I have a lot of their line telegraph eq; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00074.html (9,027 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Vertex_Yaesu Merger (score: 1): Author: "jos hermans" <on4kj@skynet.be>; Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 12:50:31 +0100; Peter, you didn't mention the "PHILIPS MOBIL RADIO".!!!!!! Jos on4kj --Message d'origine-- De?: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] De la part de John E. Cleeve Envoy&eac; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00076.html (10,025 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Vertex_Yaesu Merger (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 07:08:43 -0500; According to the press release, if the deal goes through, Motorola will have 80% controlling interest in VS (Yaesu). Here in the U.S., such announced deals are often referred to as mergers, joint-ve; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00077.html (8,579 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Vertex_Yaesu Merger (score: 1): Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 09:58:55 -0600; Heck it looks like the other 20% "ownership" is merely a payout to the CEO of YaesuVertex...who probably is a major stockholder anyway. But it certainly looks better ...certainly to those who are emp; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00081.html (10,094 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Vertex_Yaesu Merger (score: 1): Author: Scott McGrath <mcgrath@fas.harvard.edu>; Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:43:40 -0500; Well now Yaesu's dumping of repair support of everything they built prior to 2003 back in March makes sense now did not want the repair liability to derail the deal. By time this deal is done the onl; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00082.html (10,888 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Vertex_Yaesu Merger (score: 1): Author: "Roger" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 12:36:26 -0500; It takes little searching through older Yaesu radio models on the net to find that they used many solid state components that were near the end of life cycle which would have made supporting them af; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00086.html (12,839 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Vertex_Yaesu Merger (score: 1): Author: Scott McGrath <mcgrath@fas.harvard.edu>; Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:04:26 -0500; I suggest a CLOSE reading of the discontinuance notice all support was dropped for equipment manufactured prior to 2003 so if you bought a 767 in 2001 you were SOL early model FT-2000's are in the sa; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00087.html (15,381 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Vertex_Yaesu Merger (score: 1): Author: kg7hf@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:23:51 +0000; Keep in mind that with the new Rohs (lead free) and other directives being initiated, many more parts have been discontinued or are only available in a different package. ____________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00092.html (10,420 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Vertex_Yaesu Merger (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 21:43:20 +0100 (CET); find that they used many solid state components that were near the end of life cycle which would have made supporting them after new models came out problematic at best. < This is likely to happen wh; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00094.html (10,045 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Vertex_Yaesu Merger (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 21:55:53 +0100 (CET); In 1986, I visited Icom in my professional capacity. By previous arrangement, I paid cash and came away with a European Icom 471 70 cms rig at the 100+ export price. Last year, I had a failure in it; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00095.html (8,491 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] Vertex_Yaesu Merger (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 20:18:42 -0500; Ok guys ... time to end this thread. I've allowed it to go a while as Yaesu is an old and respected supplier for Hams. However, this news has little to do with AMPS. The topic has become a vehicle fo; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00102.html (8,104 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]