Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Vacuum\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Vacuum\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Vacuum (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:32:47 -0400; Sam, I'll look through all the books I read, it was one of them as I didn't see it on any web pages I was at I don't think. That's exactly what I read though under some text about tube evacuation. I'; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01315.html (7,868 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Vacuum (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:37:44 -0400; Sam, 10 atmospheres is 146.9 PSI. I could actually see this on some large power tubes. Especially tubes with fin cooling as the fins act as stiffners. Since the area that would be under pressure isn'; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01316.html (8,083 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Vacuum (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 00:00:27 -0400; Sam, It was in Tubes 201. I misquoted it, forgetting the negative value. It was 10 ^ -10 atmospheres or 10 ^ - 7 mm mercury. That would be about 0.000000002 PSI if my conversion calc is correct. Sorr; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01317.html (8,942 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Vacuum (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 00:03:20 -0400; Sam, Yes, I cured it, see other e-mail. It was a mis-quote. Earlier, I was thinking of a vacuum that would equal 150 psi pressure squeezing the envelope. You are correct, it can't be over 1 atm to be; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01318.html (8,579 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Vacuum (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 12:26:33 -0400; Ian, It was Sam Blackwell I sent this to, not Bob as I thought. Anyhow, here is my correction on the vacuum. Best, Will Sam, It was in Tubes 201. I misquoted it, forgetting the negative value. It was; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01322.html (9,123 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Vacuum (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:56:12 -0400; Bob, It was actually corrected last night, but seeing as my posts are being held up, it didn't show until today. When I screwed up on that, I figured they were talking about the external pressure as; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01371.html (7,871 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]