Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Transformer\s+secondary\s+resistance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Transformer\s+secondary\s+resistance\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Transformer secondary resistance (score: 1): Author: K1LE@ARRL.NET (Jeffrey Madore); Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 19:50:59 -0400; Thank you, gentlemen, for your responses re my questions pertaining to = the suitability of a transformer with a 106 Ohm secondary at 5300 volts = and a 120 volt primary. BTW I rechecked the primary; /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00055.html (7,928 bytes)
2. [Amps] Transformer secondary resistance (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 09:42:14 +0000; It's worth searching out the Duncan Amps web site and downloading their PSU designer software. It's very informative to get an idea of the peak and rms currents in any situation - rms especially wher; /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00062.html (8,584 bytes)
3. [Amps] Transformer secondary resistance (score: 1): Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 07:43:48 +0100; All these questions can be answered by Duncan Munro's excellent PSU Designer software. There's a link from the 'In Practice' page on my web site, where you can also pick up a file containing rectifie; /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00063.html (9,045 bytes)
4. [Amps] Transformer secondary resistance (score: 1): Author: phil@vaxxine.com (Phil (VA3UX)); Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 07:14:46 -0400; Yea Steve, the issue was with the potential for unequal load sharing between the two windings if they are not nearly identical in terms of impedance. This issue is raised primarily where two transfor; /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00064.html (8,299 bytes)
5. [Amps] Transformer secondary resistance (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 04:38:54 -0700; ? 106-ohms is decent for some finite load R, depending on the rectification circuit used. - For FWD service, using a C-filter, multiply the secondary R by a constant of c. 300 to arrive at the usuab; /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00066.html (8,888 bytes)
6. [Amps] Transformer secondary resistance (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 04:39:00 -0700; No, it's good engineering practice, Steve. - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end; /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00067.html (8,826 bytes)
7. [Amps] Transformer secondary resistance (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 12:46:27 +0000; That side of it was part of the piece, but I think the writer was also concerned about the possibility of 'backwards' current in the lower voltage winding - I can imagine it being minor where winding; /archives//html/Amps/2002-05/msg00068.html (8,618 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]