Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Toroidal\s+Tank\s+Coils\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Toroidal Tank Coils (score: 1)
Author: wc6w at juno.com (Radio WC6W)
Date: Mon Mar 3 00:23:50 2003
Hi Eric, very that should Certainly true in this venue... proceed to fuzzy assumptions... there will value is of 2KV Say WHAT!!? A typical tube amplifier with a 4KVDC plate supply should exhibit some
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00040.html (19,098 bytes)

2. [Amps] Toroidal Tank Coils (score: 1)
Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Mon Mar 3 07:49:08 2003
Not quite. The normal properly-tuned peak voltage of a near-class B amplifier (class AB approaching B) is about 80-90% of anode voltage in each direction, which would translate to 3kV or more across
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00047.html (10,057 bytes)

3. [Amps] Toroidal Tank Coils (score: 1)
Author: 2 at vc.net (2)
Date: Mon Mar 3 10:05:13 2003
is 2KV Mr. Rauch -- 80% of 4000V = 3200V. 90% of 4000V = 3600V. What's the problem with 3500V?. And I thought the phase shift in an inductor was 90?. "In a 3000V PA stage, this would be 10,000V peak
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00049.html (9,432 bytes)

4. [Amps] Toroidal Tank Coils (score: 1)
Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Mon Mar 3 10:42:17 2003
Your normal diversion is to lift things out of context. The rest of my answer explains the difference. the You thought wrong. Phase shift depends on reactance and circuit impedances. A series induct
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00053.html (10,968 bytes)

5. [Amps] Toroidal Tank Coils (score: 1)
Author: wlfuqu00 at uky.edu (Bill Fuqua)
Date: Mon Mar 3 11:12:28 2003
The phase relationship between voltage across and the current thru a true inductor is always 90 degrees. It may be less due to series resistance in the inductor but in an High Q inductor it should be
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00055.html (12,591 bytes)

6. [Amps] Toroidal Tank Coils (score: 1)
Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Mon Mar 3 12:30:33 2003
across inductor end, termination a behaves system. Either phase not currents is two fault protect of energy
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00058.html (13,576 bytes)

7. [Amps] Toroidal Tank Coils (score: 1)
Author: K1LE at ARRL.NET (Jeffrey Madore)
Date: Mon Mar 3 12:42:48 2003
end, system. Either phase Is not what you describe, the phase shift caused by the entire network? ie: EI angle at C-tune vs EI angle at C-load? Rich speaks of the E I shift in an inductor which is so
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00061.html (9,835 bytes)

8. [Amps] Toroidal Tank Coils (score: 1)
Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Mon Mar 3 13:09:22 2003
ie: No, phase shift is NOT the relationship between voltage and current in this case, nor is it normally considered except when you are looking at things like reactance or SWR. Phase shift is the re
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00062.html (8,961 bytes)

9. [Amps] Toroidal Tank Coils (score: 1)
Author: 2 at vc.net (2)
Date: Mon Mar 3 14:19:04 2003
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00064.html (8,973 bytes)

10. [Amps] Toroidal Tank Coils (score: 1)
Author: 2 at vc.net (2)
Date: Mon Mar 3 14:24:22 2003
** But it's not my fault, Tom. The professor who taught AC circuit analysis at Cal-Poly said that E leads I by 90? in and inductor and I lags E by 90? in a capacitor. Thank you very much for correct
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00065.html (8,610 bytes)

11. [Amps] Toroidal Tank Coils (score: 1)
Author: MorgusMagnificen at aol.com (MorgusMagnificen@aol.com)
Date: Fri Feb 28 12:49:50 2003
In response to offline requests and suggestions, here is the detailed calculation for the toroidal coil. I would like to proceed by making a very clear statement of the problem to be analyzed - many
/archives//html/Amps/2003-02/msg00516.html (11,973 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu