Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Thoriated\s+tungsten\s+lifetime\s+when\s+idling\s+tspa\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Thoriated tungsten lifetime when idling tspa (score: 1)
Author: "John T. M. Lyles" <jtml@lanl.gov>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:32:56 -0700
Larry and all, Eimac typically says 150% of normal current, I believe, for TT filaments. Most big toobes use either a ramped up variac or power supply, or a current limited transformer that has a gap
/archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00165.html (9,988 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Thoriated tungsten lifetime when idling tspa (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:46:33 -0500
They say twice for most tubes we deal with. The exact text says limiting current to two times the operating value helps reduce damage (movement) from repeated filament thermal cycles. I've never see
/archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00167.html (8,168 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Thoriated tungsten lifetime when idling tspa (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:00:38 -0600
The way Henry deals with #2 above is inserting a 10 ohm 50 watt power resistor in series with one side of the 240 volt primary of the filament transformer. This is on their 3X3 amps. There are 6 tap
/archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00168.html (7,881 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Thoriated tungsten lifetime when idling tspa (score: 1)
Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:32:27 -0500
There may be some truth to this because the filament emission loss is related to the filament temperature and the amount of time that it is hot, with or with out anode voltage. Running the filament c
/archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00169.html (7,606 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Thoriated tungsten lifetime when idling tspa (score: 1)
Author: Larry <larry@w7iuv.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:48:26 -0800
I would love to hear the theory behind that and John and all, I wish I could provide more background. It's been a lot of years and at the time I was still in my "cowboy" era where I only cared about
/archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00170.html (8,569 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Thoriated tungsten lifetime when idling tspa (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:40:01 -0500
Interesting, because when we would get a low emission batch of 3CX1200's they would have us run the tubes for days without any anode voltage or current at extra filament voltage. It would always bri
/archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00171.html (7,929 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Thoriated tungsten lifetime when idling tspa (score: 1)
Author: "John T. M. Lyles" <jtml@lanl.gov>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:05:29 -0700
Tom, You are correct, for Eimac its normally stated as limit the current to 2 x the operating current on turnon. I was guessing conservatively. I checked and the same thing applies with the larger tu
/archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00172.html (11,262 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Thoriated tungsten lifetime when idling tspa (score: 1)
Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:43:36 -0800
I suppose the knowledge of filaments has advanced since 1942, but there was a special reason to "make do" when the Radio Handbook was published. There is an ad in the back for RCA Transmitting Tubes.
/archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00173.html (10,393 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Thoriated tungsten lifetime when idling tspa (score: 1)
Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:26:41 +0100 (CET)
says limiting current to two times the operating value helps reduce damage (movement) from repeated filament thermal cycles.< But we all know that filament movement is caused by VHF parasitics, don't
/archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00176.html (7,642 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Thoriated tungsten lifetime when idling tspa (score: 1)
Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:34:14 +0100 (CET)
There can definitely be a problem running oxide coated cathodes for a long time without drawing current: it leads to a build up of cathode interface resistance, and according to one of my textbooks (
/archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00177.html (7,278 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Thoriated tungsten lifetime when idling tspa (score: 1)
Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:45:24 -0800
"There can definitely be a problem running oxide coated cathodes for a long time without drawing current: it leads to a build up of cathode interface resistance, and according to one of my textbooks
/archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00178.html (7,811 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu