- 1. Re: [Amps] The GU84B and GU78B tubes (score: 1)
- Author: "Leigh Turner" <invertech@frontierisp.net.au>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:45:53 +1030
- Carl, The GU84B and the so called 4CX1600B are completely different tubes. Similarly the 4CX1600U / GS23B is quite different from the now extinct GU91B. However, the readily available GS23B makes an
- /archives//html/Amps/2012-10/msg00188.html (15,623 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] The GU84B and GU78B tubes (score: 1)
- Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 19:29:44 -0700
- Leigh wrote... < snip > Not THAT fine! Compare IMD numbers with an 8877 or 3cx800. Don't blame W6TC for that! Set your focus on Svetlana USA in Huntsville. And I believe that some (many? most? all?)
- /archives//html/Amps/2012-10/msg00189.html (7,340 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] The GU84B and GU78B tubes (score: 1)
- Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:56:47 -0400
- Leigh wrote... < snip > The 4CX1600A/B was a re-badged GU91B (a very fine linear SSB tube before supply totally dried up) Not THAT fine! Compare IMD numbers with an 8877 or 3cx800. ** Some actually b
- /archives//html/Amps/2012-10/msg00192.html (8,710 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] The GU84B and GU78B tubes (score: 1)
- Author: "Val" <val@vip.bg>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:09:38 +0200
- I think that the only right word that can be used in this sentence is "always". Having seen Svetlana's quotation I think that it's hardly likely a ham will buy a factory new GU74B. 73, Val LZ1VB The
- /archives//html/Amps/2012-10/msg00194.html (7,992 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Amps] The GU84B and GU78B tubes (score: 1)
- Author: "Leigh Turner" <invertech@frontierisp.net.au>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:41:33 +1030
- Carl, The GU84B and the so called 4CX1600B are completely different tubes. Similarly the 4CX1600U / GS23B is quite different from the now extinct GU91B. However, the readily available GS23B makes an
- /archives//html/Amps/2012-10/msg00221.html (17,613 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu