I have recently received complaints from subscribers to this list of spam from the list. On examining the alleged spam emails, it appears that one or more list subscribers have harvested e-mail addre
Regarding SPAM to people on this list... I have received and continue to receive SPAM to the email address (past and present) that I use exclusively on this list. The email is NOT coming from any add
Tony, I agree 100 percent with what you have said and am certain the other describers would also in vast majority. I was unaware that a consequence of joining this list would be to have my ermail add
I think you are right about the posting of addresses by the archives. However, I don't think that your email address is safe from spam as I have opened many hotmail accounts because of spam and had s
Hi John, Hotmail used to be well known for releasing all their email addresses to the wild. I don't know how they are today. I have managed to keep quite a few email addresses completely hidden from
Tony, Forgot to mention one other thing. I had a virus on a work computer (very rare) about 3 years ago. I found out there was a virus because someone emailed me and forwarded an email that the outlo
Can I highlight one thing in this regard - I get emails intentionally sent to a large list of people from someone's address book. Maybe it's about amps policy, maybe an address change or new mobile n
Agreed. A large chunk of this problem is the creeping habit of sending an individual 'courtesy' copy of a reply that is also being posted to the list. Many kinds of e-mail software do this by default
Ian White GM3SEK escribió: I agree, one has to send only one copy. And also disagree with the "open full" access to the forum's messages including addresses, by anyone who do a simple search a
Part of the problem is that when you hit the "reply" button, it gives you the address of the sender, not the reflector. To reply to the reflector only, I have to hit the "reply to all" button, and t
I'm sure there's a setting in the preferences when you register that removes the multiple copies if someone sends to the list and to the individual. Steve ____________________________________________
Steve, I just went to the Yahoo Preferences page and found no such setting. I believe that is a function of the way the reflector sends the messages out. This is not likely to change as it is probabl
If the "Reply To:" mail header value were populated with the list's email address rather than that of the sender, then clicking the "Reply" button(should) send a reply message to the list only. Reply
Mike, This is not a Yahoo mail group. It is hosted by Contesting dot Com. 73, Tony W4ZT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
Thanks Tony: HMMMM, that even makes it more difficult because I don't have the foggiest idea where to go to establish preferences. If I went there is it possible to make those choices. I will go look
Randall: I went to the sign-up page, and there appears to be no way to make a choice about what is placed in the header. No surprise there. It still appears that those who manage this reflector may n
There are some (but not many) email programs which allow one to chose between "reply to sender", "reply to the list" and "reply to all". However, if you go to the web address shown at the bottom of e
John, Either that, our you can have a junk filter built into your e-mail client like I have. Really, with it you download all the mail, it just filters it and places the junk in the wastebasket folde
I think what the moderator was talking about are members of this list who copy and save email addresses from the list and use them to send messages to list members in bulk. Good manners dictates not
Yes, I realized my error with regard to Yahoo. However, the problem being discussed in not about receiving duplicate messages from the reflector, but that of receiving a message from the reflector an