Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SUMMARY\s+of\s+RESPONSES\:\s+4CX1600B\s+vs\.\s+GU84B\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SUMMARY\s+of\s+RESPONSES\:\s+4CX1600B\s+vs\.\s+GU84B\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] SUMMARY of RESPONSES: 4CX1600B vs. GU84B (score: 1): Author: jmaass at columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass); Date: Sat Mar 8 21:30:02 2003; Thanks to all who replied to my inquiry! Bottom line is that the 4CX1600B and GU84B are *not* pin compatible. Sockets are different, more cooling is required for the GU84B, different filament require; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00349.html (9,293 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]