Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SS\s+Amp\s+questions\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] SS Amp questions (score: 1)
Author: "Georgens, Tom" <Tom.Georgens@netapp.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 18:51:30 +0000
I will not let my love/hate relationship with ALS1300 end The ALS1300 has worked flawlessly for me in two CQWW CW contests from 8P5A and reinforced why I bought the unit. Unfortunately, multiple desi
/archives//html/Amps/2012-09/msg00130.html (8,653 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] SS Amp questions (score: 1)
Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 17:07:09 +0000
Tom, Unfortunately, multiple design, manufacturing, and quality issues have repeatedly put the product on the shelf for 6 other contests. Well, it's an MFJ, after all... I have also bought a few MJF
/archives//html/Amps/2012-09/msg00138.html (13,302 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] SS Amp questions (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 14:32:21 -0400
Unfortunately, multiple design, manufacturing, and quality issues have repeatedly put the product on the shelf for 6 other contests. Well, it's an MFJ, after all... I have also bought a few >MJF prod
/archives//html/Amps/2012-09/msg00139.html (8,178 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] SS Amp questions (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 14:39:41 -0400
Is that a personal attack, Carl? If so, on whom? 73, Pete N4ZR The World Contest Station Database, at www.conteststations.com The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at reversebe
/archives//html/Amps/2012-09/msg00140.html (8,696 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] SS Amp questions (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 16:13:10 -0400
If one looks at both the ALS-600 and ALS-1300 one will find that the amplifier modules are a very close copy of the Granberg (Motorola EB104) design for the MRF-150. Are you casting aspersions on Gr
/archives//html/Amps/2012-09/msg00141.html (8,729 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] SS Amp questions (score: 1)
Author: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 17:49:43 -0500
Are you casting asparagus on my cooking? Curley Howard _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2012-09/msg00142.html (7,241 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] SS Amp questions (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Kaidor" <jerry@tr2.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 21:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
** My impression of MFJ is that they do have some pretty decent engineering in their stuff, but their quality control is strictly to meet a price. - Jerry Kaidor, KF6VB ______________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2012-09/msg00143.html (8,026 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] SS Amp questions (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 04:00:26 -0400
They do make some handy equipment that works fairly well, they make some to a price and stretch the power out beyond reliability limits, but you only need to look at the QC on the same items built un
/archives//html/Amps/2012-09/msg00144.html (9,447 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] SS Amp questions (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq72@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:41:05 +0100
Manfred has said most of what I was going to say. I'd add a couple more comments. RF power fets don't have quite the uniformity of characteristics that switching fets have. In particular, threshold v
/archives//html/Amps/2012-09/msg00145.html (8,413 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] SS Amp questions (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:46:39 -0700
REPLY: Me too. Their SWR analyzers are hard to beat for the price. Everything else is suspect. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/Amps/2012-09/msg00146.html (8,010 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu