Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SGC\-Mini\s+Lini\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SGC\-Mini\s+Lini\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] SGC-Mini Lini (score: 1): Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>; Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 22:21:44 -0400; Does anyone out there actually own a Mini Lini? 73 Bill wa4lav _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00189.html (6,744 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] SGC-Mini Lini (score: 1): Author: ToddRoberts2001@aol.com; Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 22:54:16 EDT; Does anyone out there actually own a Mini Lini? 73 Bill wa4lav ______________________________________________________________ I don't think SGC ever actually produced any of the Mini-Linis for sale.; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00191.html (7,121 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] SGC-Mini Lini (score: 1): Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>; Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:40:07 -0400; Well, I think the contact problem was the least of their worries. I suspect the is a fundamental problem with the product which I don't believe they ever overcame. To accurately reproduce a ssb signa; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00192.html (10,115 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] SGC-Mini Lini (score: 1): Author: "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:35:39 -0400; Bill WA4LAV et al: Your writeup on the builtin problem with the MiniLini is right on! To add some detail, I understand that the problem was supposedly minimized by using a 250 kHz switching frequency; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00241.html (8,070 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] SGC-Mini Lini (score: 1): Author: Radio WC6W <wc6w_amps@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:06:19 -0700 (PDT); Hi Bill, Yes, the delay between the Carrier and the Modulation has to be equalized somewhere... The original Kahn scheme implemented it at a fixed frequency with an LC delay. In the 21st century, one; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00253.html (12,563 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] SGC-Mini Lini (score: 1): Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>; Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:55:15 +0000; When I joined this list a few years ago, it was in search of information and perhaps help regarding an envelope-restored amp I was trying to develop. It's funny that only now I learn about the Mini L; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00271.html (10,684 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] SGC-Mini Lini (score: 1): Author: Radio WC6W <wc6w_amps@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:50:43 -0700 (PDT); Hi Manfred, <snip> I have a PDF somewhere that addresses this problem. I'll dig it out and send it to you I once looked at doing it that way too -- gets a mite ugly. I'm currently building a test bed; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00288.html (11,410 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]