Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB\-221\s+input\s+network\s+should\s+have\s+read\s+SB\-201\/SB\-200\s+input\s+network\.\.\.\.etc\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB\-221\s+input\s+network\s+should\s+have\s+read\s+SB\-201\/SB\-200\s+input\s+network\.\.\.\.etc\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] SB-221 input network should have read SB-201/SB-200 input network....etc (score: 1): Author: k7ddmjb@qwest.net (Mike Baker); Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 09:17:32 -0700; Guess I should have waited until morning to type my request. Didn't remember what I was working on this time! ;>) To help reduce the confusion of my original post here is a bit of clarification. The; /archives//html/Amps/2002-11/msg00009.html (8,792 bytes)
2. [Amps] SB-221 input network should have read SB-201/SB-200 input network....etc (score: 1): Author: carlseye@tampabay.rr.com (carl seyresdahl); Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 12:24:01 -0500; Mike and all: I just remembered I have an SB201 i;ve been working on, Just that i haven't looked at it for so long, since i've been working on some other amps for other people. The 40 mtr. coil has 1; /archives//html/Amps/2002-11/msg00010.html (10,321 bytes)
3. [Amps] SB-221 input network should have read SB-201/SB-200 input network....etc (score: 1): Author: carlseye@tampabay.rr.com (carl seyresdahl); Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:02:20 -0500; Here's another one for you ,Mike; my handbook lists the driving impedance of a 572b as 215 ohms, so for two of them in parallel that would be about 107 ohms . the first time I did an SB200 I tuned th; /archives//html/Amps/2002-11/msg00011.html (10,434 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]