Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB\-220\s+Unmodification\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB\-220\s+Unmodification\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] SB-220 Unmodification (score: 1): Author: <johna8119-amps@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:34:03 -0800 (PST); Some of you may recall that last summer I posted some questions about an extensively modified Heathkit SB-220 that would not work. I put some pictures, etc. on a web page. Several of the helpful guys; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00253.html (6,930 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] SB-220 Unmodification (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:20:40 -0800; Many kudos and congrats to you John. Nice job on the restoration of one of handom's most faithful workhorse amps. There have been many amps come and go, but almost all hams know about the remarkable; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00254.html (7,941 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] SB-220 Unmodification (score: 1): Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:34:47 -0500; You gotta hand it those who are still willing to tackle a job like that.!! I'd dearly love to get my hands on something like that>>!! As it is I've got my hands full with projects that may or may not; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00256.html (10,204 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]