Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB\-220\s*$/: 95 ]

Total 95 documents matching your query.

21. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: AC5YV@hot.rr.com (Richard)
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 18:43:24 -0600
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_000F_01C04CD8.6FFBE540 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I need to replace the C
/archives//html/Amps/2000-11/msg00114.html (8,468 bytes)

22. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 02:15:05 -0800
The newer electrolytics have more C in the same case size. I would go with 470uF, 450v, 105-degrees C. The price break is at 10 units, so it pays to buy 16 caps and divide the order. It would help t
/archives//html/Amps/2000-11/msg00116.html (7,346 bytes)

23. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: da_kang@hotmail.com (Jeff Wolf)
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 15:14:31 GMT
Replacing the stock SB220 fils XFormer makes you have to use a step start circuit on the fils circuit. The original transformer uses a core that saturates at a little over the avg current draw of th
/archives//html/Amps/2000-11/msg00118.html (7,403 bytes)

24. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon)
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 19:33:38 GMT
Hello Richard I read a post on another list that Harbach will be back and open for business Dec 1. 73 Rick KC5AJX _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Pr
/archives//html/Amps/2000-11/msg00126.html (7,384 bytes)

25. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 1997 11:56:33 EDT
On Mon, 29 Sep 1997 14:41:05 -0500 w5hvv@aeneas.net (Rod Fitz-Randolph) writes: Hi Rod..just got back from the NC trip....280 messages in the que! A 200 with good tubes and a stiff 240V line will out
/archives//html/Amps/1997-10/msg00021.html (8,846 bytes)

26. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: w5hvv@aeneas.net (Rod Fitz-Randolph)
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 14:41:05 -0500
I have an amateur friend that has an opportunity to purchase a "Pristine" SB-200 for $300, however, the present owner (who has only owned it for 3 months says that "those that claim 1,000 watts outpu
/archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00380.html (7,385 bytes)

27. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: morel.grunberg@telrad.co.il (Morel Grunberg)
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 08:50:39 +0200
Rod, My previous SB-200 was able to put a 760W PEP on 80m and 470W PEP on 10m on a dummy load, with new 572B tubes. For a longer life I suggest you to work at 4-500W CW, 300W RTTY and max. 600W PEP S
/archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00383.html (8,688 bytes)

28. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: vk3ew@rint.com.au (David VK3EW)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 00:11:20 +1000
Hi All, I just got me a good second hand Heathkit SB220, wow.!!! and I HATE to turn it on, because it all turns on at once. The Filaments and the HT all together, those poor 3500z dont know whats hit
/archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00258.html (8,253 bytes)

29. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: morel.grunberg@telrad.co.il (Morel Grunberg)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 17:22:39 +0300
David, Harbach Electronics is selling a lot of upgrade kits for SB-220 ( soft start, soft key, HV caps, fans......). Their e-mail: wa4dru@iu.net. They do have a WEB-site with all the stuff but I lost
/archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00259.html (9,919 bytes)

30. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 97 08:27:55 -0700
The SB-220 was designed to be turned on this way--provided that the HV is initially set to the low-tap. . The measured 3-500Z filament inrush current in a SB-220 is about 60% higher than the normal
/archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00262.html (8,606 bytes)

31. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: philk5pc@connect.net (Phil Clements)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 11:52:09 -0500
say Why screw up a near-perfect circuit? The filament transformer is specially designed to be self-limiting on inrush current. The 3-500Z has instant-heat filaments. You are not hurting a thing when
/archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00265.html (8,550 bytes)

32. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: gblau@goodnet.com (Gary Blau)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 11:07:35 -0700 (MST)
David: All the comments about not needing a standby switch or step-start circuit for the 220 are technically correct, but I still find them handy, harmless and emotionally comforting! It's strictly
/archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00267.html (9,438 bytes)

33. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 23:18:57 +0000
To: <amps@contesting.com> Hi Phil, As I understand what you are saying, you seem to be indicating turning the filament off and on does not decrease tube life. If so, I disagree with that. A very com
/archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00273.html (9,249 bytes)

34. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 97 21:26:01 -0700
To: <amps@contesting.com> Eimac says that tube life will not be compromised as long as the filament inrush overcurrent remains equal to or less than the normal current. In a SB-220, this is assuredl
/archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00276.html (9,581 bytes)

35. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: philk5pc@connect.net (Phil Clements)
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 01:26:51 -0500
Everything that happens to a tube after it leaves the factory decreases its life....even sitting on a shelf. (especially sitting with the plate horizontal on a shelf) My experience is that the tube w
/archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00277.html (9,647 bytes)

36. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 97 07:04:16 -0700
(Phil Clements) Heath SB-220 owners add the switch because they know not, Phil. The good news is unjustifyable switch can be usefully rewired to control the relays for the SB-220 160m modification d
/archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00281.html (8,524 bytes)

37. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net)
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 10:59:59 +0000
To: <amps@contesting.com> I see we are indeed on the same wavelength. I didn't want anyone to think shutting the PA filaments off and on more than necessary was harmless, just because the inrush was
/archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00284.html (9,523 bytes)

38. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: philk5pc@connect.net (Phil Clements)
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 11:12:56 -0500
That guy chose the wrong tube for his operating style...had he chosen 3-500Z, 3-1000Z, oe 4-1000A, he would still most likely be on his original set. My comments were strictly limited to the SB-220.
/archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00286.html (8,686 bytes)

39. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net)
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 14:41:18 +0000
To: <amps@contesting.com> The 3CX1200 series uses the same filament structure as the 3-1000Z, 4-1000A, and similar tubes Are you saying the type of envelope affects the filament life? 73, Tom W8JI -
/archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00287.html (9,105 bytes)

40. [AMPS] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: biss@epg.nist.gov (Robert Biss)
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 09:01:35
I've been reading with great interest the SB-220 comments of the past couple of months and decided it is time for me to throw my 2 cents worth in.... I received my first 220 kit from the factory duri
/archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00306.html (9,319 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu