Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB\-200\/572B\s+issues\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB\-200\/572B\s+issues\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] SB-200/572B issues (score: 1): Author: "me" <n1miw@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:19:18 -0500; Hello group. I'm trying to find the answer to why I'm having so much trouble with my amplifier, but not having much luck. The SB-200 performs well on 80, 40 and 20. However, on 15, it will not tune p; /archives//html/Amps/2008-11/msg00118.html (8,514 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] SB-200/572B issues (score: 1): Author: "ANTHONY JAPHA" <tjjapha@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:59:03 -0500; Why should anyone, even on a helpful site like this one, read an essentially anonymous post? tune out The further & 150-200ma from with more also _______________________________________________ Amps; /archives//html/Amps/2008-11/msg00120.html (10,569 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] SB-200/572B issues (score: 1): Author: cemilton@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:19:52 -0500; Looks like he is N1MIW and his name is Larry.................. Could be wrong................his questions appear valid. What's missing? 73 Chuck W4MIL --Original Message-- From: ANTHONY JAPHA <tjjap; /archives//html/Amps/2008-11/msg00121.html (11,071 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] SB-200/572B issues (score: 1): Author: Glen Zook <gzook@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:21:06 -0800 (PST); Why do you consider this to be an anonymous post? The poster's call is N1MIW as is indicated by the E-Mail address. That contains considerably more information than something like bob12345@aol.com wh; /archives//html/Amps/2008-11/msg00122.html (8,462 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] SB-200/572B issues (score: 1): Author: "ANTHONY JAPHA" <tjjapha@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:28:46 -0500; Sorry, My mistake. I did not look further into his email address to discover his call. (It would be nice if writers did include calls in their posts.) 73, Tony, N2UN Looks like he is N1MIW and his na; /archives//html/Amps/2008-11/msg00125.html (11,721 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] SB-200/572B issues (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:41:34 -0500; Any semblence of coherence. He posts these long rambling messages on another site also. IMO his only solution is to either send the amp to someone that knows what they are doing or sell it as is and; /archives//html/Amps/2008-11/msg00127.html (13,152 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] SB-200/572B issues (score: 1): Author: cemilton@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:07:29 -0500; GA Larry, I recently restored an SB-200 and have since sold it to a local ham friend who is getting full power on all bands and the rig is doing what Heath said it would.? They are great little desk; /archives//html/Amps/2008-11/msg00132.html (14,909 bytes)
8. [Amps] SB-200/572B issues (score: 1): Author: "Zielinski, Laurence" <lzielinski@simplexgrinnell.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:13:12 -0500; You know, I would've thought that the more descriptive of the problem, the easier it would be for someone to assist me in troubleshooting. It's "rambling" to some because they have more knowledge tha; /archives//html/Amps/2008-11/msg00134.html (9,102 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] SB-200/572B issues (score: 1): Author: "ANTHONY JAPHA" <tjjapha@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:34:46 -0500; OM, Your call was not displayed to me at all. Your email was, simply, "me". Neither did you sign your call, only Larry. Not much help. Still, if I had looked at Properties in your email address, I wo; /archives//html/Amps/2008-11/msg00135.html (10,279 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] SB-200/572B issues (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:54:30 -0500; Well Larry, my comments werent meant to be arrogant but to simply bring the facts foreward. Since you appeared to ignore advice from several and went off half cocked on your own speaks volumes. And i; /archives//html/Amps/2008-11/msg00136.html (10,460 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] SB-200/572B issues (score: 1): Author: "W7RY" <w7ry@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:52:53 -0800; Sorry Larry. But I don't see headers. And I did not make any comments either. When posting, it's always best to sign with your call and name. Sometimes it get replied to soooo many times, it's hard t; /archives//html/Amps/2008-11/msg00139.html (9,847 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]