Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\:\s+National\s+R\-175\s+Choke\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\:\s+National\s+R\-175\s+Choke\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Re: National R-175 Choke (score: 1): Author: sm2ekm at telia.com (Jan Erik Holm); Date: Sat Mar 29 02:22:33 2003; I?ve heard that this thing will cover 1.5 - 30 MHz without any resonance, must be due to the nicrome!! Regards SM2EKM --; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00916.html (7,220 bytes)
2. [Amps] Re: National R-175 Choke (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (2); Date: Sat Mar 29 05:39:11 2003; ** Ni-Cr has too much DC-R for use in RF-chokes. Cu has c. 50-times better DC conductivity. - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00917.html (6,545 bytes)
3. [Amps] Re: National R-175 Choke (score: 1): Author: gmguerin at voyager.net (George & Marijke Guerin); Date: Sat Mar 29 08:19:57 2003; Gentlemen: I thought the reason National went to R-175A was to avoid a 15 meter resonance in the R-175. I think they are both 1950s vintage, although the R-175 might have been made in the late 1940s.; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00919.html (8,030 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]