Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\:\s+Filament\s+Current\s+Limiting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\:\s+Filament\s+Current\s+Limiting\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Re: Filament Current Limiting (score: 1): Author: RFlabnotes at aol.com (RFlabnotes@aol.com); Date: Tue Mar 18 13:39:24 2003; Rich: Well, I did a little quick research on the subject (which admittedly has not crossed my radar screen before) and I must say that you are pretty much right on the money. This issue contains a mi; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00682.html (8,818 bytes)
2. [Amps] Re: Filament Current Limiting (score: 1): Author: wmoorejr at cox.net (SteveM); Date: Tue Mar 18 15:44:06 2003; hat those like me, of ** How about the filament choke for the inductance? I know very little, but I seem to remember that an inductor resists rapid current change ? ** 73, Steve wd0ct For be and incr; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00684.html (9,378 bytes)
3. [Amps] Re: Filament Current Limiting (score: 1): Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue Mar 18 20:40:23 2003; but The filament choke cancels all differential mode inductance, because of the bifilar winding. The inductance it does have is too low anyway to mean anything. Most of the current limiting is cause; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00691.html (7,109 bytes)
4. [Amps] Re: Filament Current Limiting (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (rlm); Date: Tue Mar 18 21:02:57 2003; ** mo' words ain't always mo' betta. cheers, Dave - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00694.html (10,411 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]