Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\:\s+Chassis\s+cleaning\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\:\s+Chassis\s+cleaning\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Re: Chassis cleaning (score: 1): Author: bearlabs@netzero.net (BEAR); Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:50:08 -0500; With the Alodine coating, you may not have that much problem cleaning it up... Seems like something has eaten through the Alodine, which is relatively soft and thing compared to anodize... I'd opt fo; /archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00113.html (8,257 bytes)
2. [Amps] Re: Chassis cleaning (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:56:27 -0600; much I have quite a bit of experience with this deck. If you are going for just single-band, and can get it cleaned up per Bear's advice, that is okay. If you are planning a roller tank coil, or ban; /archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00115.html (7,069 bytes)
3. [Amps] Re: Chassis cleaning (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:53:17 -0000; recoat - or of Isn't anodising non-conductive? That might not be optimum on an amplifier chassis. Steve; /archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00116.html (6,921 bytes)
4. [Amps] Re: Chassis cleaning (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:28:06 -0600; Anodized chassis have been a Henry trademark for years. If you use good lockwashers on all the bolts, no problem. (((73))) Phil, K5PC; /archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00117.html (6,779 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]