Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\:\s+Amps\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+12\,\s+Issue\s+41\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\:\s+Amps\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+12\,\s+Issue\s+41\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Re: Amps Digest, Vol 12, Issue 41 (score: 1): Author: K3vw@aol.com; Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 16:30:43 EST; I do not agree that the 1200 is better than the 1500 and here is why. The 1500 has only 50 watts of filament wattage verses the 1200 at 150 watts. The 1500 does not need a neutralizing capacitor at t; /archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00333.html (6,884 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Re: Amps Digest, Vol 12, Issue 41 (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:26:51 -0800; and will ** The "neutralizing" circuit in later production Al-1200s reportedly makes the tube more prone to oscillate at the AL-1200's VHF anode resonance than earlier models which do not have "neut; /archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00337.html (8,276 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]