Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+RJ1H\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+RJ1H\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] RJ1H (score: 1): Author: "Marc Chicoine" <wc1x@btinternet.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:20:10 -0000; All, Are Jennings RJ1H relays suitable for R.F. applications? (sans SB-220) Marc, WC1X, 4Z8BB, M0VOA _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00350.html (6,040 bytes)
2. [Amps] RJ1H (score: 1): Author: "Marc Chicoine" <wc1x@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 02:50:34 -0000; Hal, Thanks for the guidance for the proper use of "sans". Further to my original question: RJ1H relays have tungsten contacts used primarily in hot switching applications. The contact resistance is; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00355.html (7,691 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] RJ1H (score: 1): Author: "Marc Wullaert" <marc.wullaert3@pandora.be>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:21:58 +0100; http://www.gigavac.com/products/relays/datasheets/gh1_3_5/index.htm (SPDT), _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00360.html (9,270 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] RJ1H (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 02:57:46 -0800; For SSB and CW, yes. However, for RTTY or AØ at 28MHz @ 1500w, probably not. Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00362.html (8,997 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] RJ1H (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:07:35 -0500; Having just killed a Kilovac HC-1 (equivalent to the RJ-1A) in my modified SB-220 due to hot switching, I am interested in whether the RJ-1H might prove more resistant to operator errors. 73, Pete N4; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00370.html (10,442 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] RJ1H (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 04:31:09 -0800; Yes, because the tungsten contact version is designed to hot-switch. A simpler solution is to use a speedup circuit so that it won't hotswitch. As I see it, repeated arcing - of any metal - does the; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00371.html (10,875 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]